Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 21, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
In 2016, major initiatives have been announced by federal, state and city governments to combat unequal pay for women. For example, the EEOC is requesting new information on EEO-1s that will better track information that reveals pay discrimination. As complicated as compliance with employment laws can be, the fact that employers increasingly are called to answer to three sovereigns whose laws do not coincide makes that job all the more complicated.The New York City Council is now deliberating over a new employment regulation that would prohibit businesses from inquiring into a job applicant’s salary history. Sponsors of the proposed bill maintain that it will help reduce the likelihood that women will be prejudiced by prior salary levels and help break the cycle of gender pay inequity.
Under Int. 1253, it would be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer, employment agency, employee or agent thereof:
Notably, Int. 1253 would not apply to any actions taken by an NYC employer or employment agency pursuant to any federal, state or local law that authorizes the disclosure or verification of salary history for employment purposes.
Since being introduced on August 16, 2016, the salary inquiry bill has garnered the support of 28 City Council Members. Should the measure continue to progress, Mayor Bill de Blasio is expected to sign it. The new requirements would take effect 120 days from enactment.
Massachusetts recently passed similar legislation. The New Jersey State Assembly is considering a bill (A-4119) that would amend the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) to ban employers from seeking salary information from prospective job applicants.
We will be closely tracking the status of the bill and will post updates as they become available. Should the bill become law, New York City employers will likely be required to amend their hiring practices, including those related to job applications, employee interviews, and salary negotiation.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Gary Young, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!