
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: June 25, 2021

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
When New York legalized the recreational use of cannabis for adults 21 and over, it also amended the state’s off-duty conduct law. As amended, New York Labor Law § 201-d generally prevents employers from taking adverse actions in response to an employee’s use of cannabis outside the workplace.
New York’s off-duty conduct law prohibits discrimination against employees based on their lawful off-duty conduct and applies to all employers with employees in New York. Covered conduct includes political activities, the legal use of consumable products, such as alcohol and tobacco, and other legal recreational activities outside work hours and off the employer’s premises. “Work hours” is defined as “all time, including paid and unpaid breaks and meal periods, that the employee is suffered, permitted or expected to be engaged in work, and all time the employee is actually engaged in work.”
New York Labor Law § 201-d contains several exceptions. For instance, it does not protect activity that creates a material conflict of interest related to the employer’s trade secrets, proprietary information or other proprietary or business interest. Additionally, an employer does not violate the law when it takes action based on the belief either that: (i) the employer’s actions were required by statute, regulation, ordinance or other governmental mandate, (ii) the employer’s actions were permissible pursuant to an established substance abuse or alcohol program or workplace policy, professional contract or collective bargaining agreement, or (iii) the individual’s actions were deemed by an employer or previous employer to be illegal or to constitute habitually poor performance, incompetency or misconduct.
On March 31, 2021, Gov. Andrew Cuomo legalized recreational cannabis by signing the New York Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA) into law. The MRTA includes several provisions that address legal cannabis use by employees.
With regard to off-duty cannabis use, New York Labor Law § 201-d now makes it unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire, employ or license, or to discharge from employment or otherwise discriminate against an individual because of:
The MRTA also adds new cannabis-related exceptions to the off-duty law. Employers do not violate the law when taking an action related to the use of cannabis in the following circumstances:
Because the amendments took effect immediately, employers should review their employee policies and procedures, including employee handbooks, to determine what changes may be necessary. It is important to note that while the MRTA prohibits employers for taking an adverse action in response to off-duty recreational cannabis use, it does not prohibit them from maintaining a drug-free workplace. Accordingly, employers may still prohibit workers from using, consuming, or possessing cannabis during work hours or on the business premises. As noted above, the new exceptions related to cannabis also allow employers to discipline employees for on-the-job impairment.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Author: George McGowan

In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Author: George McGowan

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!