Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 8, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Commercial evictions in New Jersey are poised to increase under new orders issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court. While most eviction proceedings were placed on “pause” in light of COVID-19, commercial landlords and lenders may now proceed with certain landlord/tenant actions and post-judgment actions in commercial foreclosures.
In response to the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency, the Supreme Court of New Jersey has authorized the temporary suspension of landlord/tenant trials, subject to a few narrow exceptions, since March 16, 2020. In July 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an order that allowed commercial or residential landlords to make an application for an eviction trial in certain emergency situations, including if a tenant was destroying the property or engaged in illegal activity. While commercial foreclosure trials have continued during the pandemic, the courts have withheld post-judgment action, including the issuance of writs of possession.
While these restrictions have provided welcome relief for commercial tenants, they have made it difficult for landlords to regain possession of commercial properties, even when tenant businesses are no longer operational. Lenders have also been left in limbo with regard to whether they may proceed with foreclosures.
In a Notice to the Bar, dated February 5, 2021, the New Jersey judiciary announced that, effective February 15, 2021, courts will resume post-trial activity, including issuance of writs of possession, for commercial foreclosure matters.
The announcement is likely unwelcome news for commercial property owners that are behind on mortgage payments. At the same time, it is a necessary step towards returning the legal system to its pre-pandemic operating status. By allowing actions to proceed through the legal process, it will also bring clarity for borrowers and lenders.
In a second Notice to the Bar, dated February 5, 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified and expanded the circumstances in which a landlord may apply by Order to Show Cause for a trial in a commercial landlord/tenant matter.
Under the Order, a commercial landlord filing an Order to Show Cause must still allege emergent circumstances, and the basis of the landlord/tenant action generally can’t be nonpayment of rent. However, emergent circumstances can now exist where the tenant has vacated the property; the tenant’s business is not operating and will not resume operations; or the commercial landlord is facing foreclosure or a tax lien.
In such cases, the court will evaluate the application and determine whether emergent circumstances exist, and a hearing will be held. If the court finds that emergent circumstances exist, the commercial tenant will be notified, and a trial will be scheduled. After that trial, if the commercial landlord prevails, judgment will be entered, and a warrant of removal can be issued.
The Orders will not lead to a rash of commercial evictions overnight. However, the easing of restrictions does mean that parties to landlord/tenant and commercial foreclosure actions may need to shift their legal strategies.
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and we slowly approach the “new normal,” additional orders are likely. We encourage lenders/borrowers and tenants/ landlords to stay up-to-date on legal developments at both the state and local level and contact experienced counsel to determine how you may be impacted.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Chris Dzwilewski, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!