Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 8, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Commercial evictions in New Jersey are poised to increase under new orders issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court. While most eviction proceedings were placed on “pause” in light of COVID-19, commercial landlords and lenders may now proceed with certain landlord/tenant actions and post-judgment actions in commercial foreclosures.
In response to the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency, the Supreme Court of New Jersey has authorized the temporary suspension of landlord/tenant trials, subject to a few narrow exceptions, since March 16, 2020. In July 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an order that allowed commercial or residential landlords to make an application for an eviction trial in certain emergency situations, including if a tenant was destroying the property or engaged in illegal activity. While commercial foreclosure trials have continued during the pandemic, the courts have withheld post-judgment action, including the issuance of writs of possession.
While these restrictions have provided welcome relief for commercial tenants, they have made it difficult for landlords to regain possession of commercial properties, even when tenant businesses are no longer operational. Lenders have also been left in limbo with regard to whether they may proceed with foreclosures.
In a Notice to the Bar, dated February 5, 2021, the New Jersey judiciary announced that, effective February 15, 2021, courts will resume post-trial activity, including issuance of writs of possession, for commercial foreclosure matters.
The announcement is likely unwelcome news for commercial property owners that are behind on mortgage payments. At the same time, it is a necessary step towards returning the legal system to its pre-pandemic operating status. By allowing actions to proceed through the legal process, it will also bring clarity for borrowers and lenders.
In a second Notice to the Bar, dated February 5, 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified and expanded the circumstances in which a landlord may apply by Order to Show Cause for a trial in a commercial landlord/tenant matter.
Under the Order, a commercial landlord filing an Order to Show Cause must still allege emergent circumstances, and the basis of the landlord/tenant action generally can’t be nonpayment of rent. However, emergent circumstances can now exist where the tenant has vacated the property; the tenant’s business is not operating and will not resume operations; or the commercial landlord is facing foreclosure or a tax lien.
In such cases, the court will evaluate the application and determine whether emergent circumstances exist, and a hearing will be held. If the court finds that emergent circumstances exist, the commercial tenant will be notified, and a trial will be scheduled. After that trial, if the commercial landlord prevails, judgment will be entered, and a warrant of removal can be issued.
The Orders will not lead to a rash of commercial evictions overnight. However, the easing of restrictions does mean that parties to landlord/tenant and commercial foreclosure actions may need to shift their legal strategies.
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and we slowly approach the “new normal,” additional orders are likely. We encourage lenders/borrowers and tenants/ landlords to stay up-to-date on legal developments at both the state and local level and contact experienced counsel to determine how you may be impacted.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Chris Dzwilewski, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!