A new rule regarding electronic trademark application submissions will take effect on February 15, 2020…
A new rule regarding electronic trademark application submissions will take effect on February 15, 2020. To ensure that your submissions to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are accepted, it is important to understand the new requirements.
New E-Filing Requirements
Under the USPTO’s final rule, trademark applicants and registrants will be required to file trademark applications and related documents using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). The USPTO’s goal is to make the trademark registration process entirely electronic.
The rule also requires the designation of an email address for receiving USPTO correspondence concerning these submissions, which will be either that of the applicant or registrant (if unrepresented) or an authorized attorney. Trademark applicants and registrants must also provide and maintain an accurate postal address to ensure that the USPTO can contact them if their email correspondence address doesn’t work.
Exceptions to E-Filing Requirement
There are some exceptions to the requirement to file electronically through TEAS. One involves submissions under the Trademark Law Treaty (TLT) and the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks (STLT). Nationals of TLT members that are not also members of STLT at the time of submission of the relevant document are not required to file electronically or receive communications from the USPTO via email.
The rule also allows for physical specimens to be submitted separately when it is not possible to submit them using TEAS given the nature of the mark. For instance, if the application or registration is for a scent or flavor mark, because the required specimen must show use, or continued use, of the scent or flavor, it cannot be uploaded electronically. In that situation, the applicant may submit the application through TEAS and indicate that it is mailing the specimen to the USPTO.
An applicant or registrant may file a petition to the Director requesting acceptance of a submission filed on paper in three situations: (1) when TEAS is unavailable on the date of the deadline for the submission; (2) when the party timely filed a paper submission, but is unable to resubmit the document electronically by the deadline; and (3) when an extraordinary circumstance prevented the party from submitting the document electronically.
Conclusion
Going forward, trademark owners should regularly monitor the USPTO’s electronic systems, particularly after filing a submission to the USPTO. It is also important to keep your contact information up-to-date.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
