Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 30, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIf you have kids (or a very good memory back to your own childhood), you may recall that Play-Doh has a very distinctive smell. It is such an integral part of the product that Hasbro, Inc. recently filed for federal trademark protection for that scent.

Hasbro sells 500 million cans of Play-Doh each year and recently made headlines when it announced plans to again manufacture the clay in the United States. According to the company, it has used the same scent in its Play-Doh since 1995. If you are having difficulty placing the scent, the trademark registration application describes it as “a unique scent formed through the combination of a sweet, slightly musky, vanilla-like fragrance, with slight overtones of cherry, and the natural smell of a salted, wheat-based dough.”
Hasbro maintains that it already has “legally enforceable common law trademark rights” for this scent. However, the company filed a federal trademark application for this scent on February 14 of this year to bolster its legal rights. Federal trademark registration has several important benefits, including:
Trademark registrations for scents are very rare. In addition to a lower demand for such non-conventional trademarks, they are also more difficult to obtain. As the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office acknowledges in the U.S. Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP), “The amount of evidence required to establish that a scent or fragrance functions as a mark is substantial.” To obtain federal trademark registration for a scent, the applicant must demonstrate that (1) the scent serves a nonfunctional purpose; and (2) the scent has acquired distinctiveness.
Despite the high threshold, there have been at least a dozen scent marks on the federal trademark register since 1990. Examples include a mark described as “high impact, fresh, floral fragrance reminiscent of Plumeria blossoms” used for sewing thread and embroidery yarn. Another one is a mark for a “bubble gum” scent for shoes and flip flops.
Assuming Hasbro’s trademark is approved, how exactly will the company enforce it? Since Internet search tools and monitoring services are unavailable for scent trademarks, the company will likely have to rely upon its own investigations and upon the public to notify the company about potential trademark infringements.
While this policing method may be less scientific, the deterrent value alone may make registration worthwhile. According to Hasbro, it is not aware of any potential infringement to date. However, Hasbro is hoping that it can obtain a federal registration to serve as notice to its competitors that they may not use the same distinctive scent in their modeling clays.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, David Einhorn, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!