The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently acknowledged that it is facing a surge in trademark filings...
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently acknowledged that it is facing a surge in trademark filings. More importantly, the USPTO is struggling to keep up, leading to longer response times for many trademark owners and applicants.
Significant Increase in Trademark Filings
In a recent blog post, David Gooder, Commissioner for Trademarks, discussed what the ongoing surge in trademark filings means for applicants. According to Gooder, trademark applications from U.S. and foreign applicants have surged to unprecedented levels over the past several months.
As of June 17, the increase is approximately 63% over last year, which translates to about 211,000 more applications. In December 2020 alone, the USPTO received 92,608 trademark applications, an increase of 172% over December 2019. According to Gooder, this surge has doubled the number of applications waiting to be examined and increased waiting times at various stages in the USPTO’s processes. As a result, applicants may have to wait longer for initial processing of their application, receiving an office action, processing of responses to office actions, and reviewing of post-registration filings, Gooder warned.
The USPTO is currently examining the reasons behind the surge but has determined that the increase comes from both foreign and domestic filings and is caused in part by an increase in e-commerce during the pandemic. “For our customers, the bottom line is that applications are coming in faster than we have historically been able to examine them, and the backlog is increasing,” Gooder wrote. “We are keenly aware of this challenge and have taken steps to increase productivity while maintaining the high quality our applicants expect.”
To address the surge, the USPTO is implementing information technology solutions and system enhancements to increase the speed at which it can process applications. It has also hired additional examining attorneys and staff, established better ways to distribute the workload among its current attorneys and staff, and continues to look for more ways to increase efficiency. “Through these and other actions, we will eventually bring our processing times back to customary levels,” Gooder wrote.
Trademarks appearing inTrademark Electronic Search System(TESS): Initial applications generally appear in TESS in about a week.
New application assigned to attorney: Historically, new applications have been reviewed by an attorney between two and three months after the application is filed. With the huge surge in filings, the USPTO’s unexamined application inventory is much higher and it’s taking between four and five months to examine initial applications.
Responses to office actions: Currently, processing by the examination support unit may take 90 days or more.
Post Registration: Processing times for post-registration maintenance filing backlogs normally average about 30 days. Currently, Post Registration processing may take about 60 days.
Trademark applicants and owners can increase the likelihood that their filings are accepted and processed more quickly by verifying that they have submitted all of the necessary information and required documentation. With the USPTO facing delays, it is imperative to get things right the first time around by working with an experienced trademark attorney.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
