Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 21, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhile the # symbol once referred to numbers, it is now synonymous with social media. As a result, businesses are increasingly seeking to incorporate hashtags into their trademark registrations. While hashtags may be a relatively recent phenomenon, the standard rules generally apply when seeking to register a trademark that incorporates the symbol.

Hashtags started on Twitter as a way to link posts on the site, but are now used on a wide range of social media platforms. From social causes to television shows, to news events, there is virtually no limit to what word or phrase can be used as a hashtag. In 2014, the word “hashtag” gained official recognition in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. The official definition is: “A word or phrase preceded by the symbol # that classifies or categorizes the accompanying text (such as a tweet).”
According to a recent trademark study conducted by CompuMark, the number of hashtag trademark applications filed globally increased 64 percent from 2015 to 2016. Since the first ever trademark application for a hashtag was filed in 2010, there have been well over 5,000 applications. Nearly half were filed in 2016. Not surprisingly, CompuMark found that the United States overwhelmingly led the world with regard to the number hashtag trademark applications filed in 2016, with 608 in total.
In response to a flood of registration applications for trademarks containing hashtags, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) advised its trademark examiners in 2013 that a mark comprising or including the hash symbol (#) or the term HASHTAG can be registered as a trademark or service mark so long as it “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services.” This is the same standard that applies to any other word or phrase that is sought to be trademarked.
Accordingly, combining a hashtag with generic or merely descriptive words or phrases does not qualify for registration as a trademark. However, pairing arbitrary or suggestive words and phrases with the # symbol or “HASHTAG” term does entitle the owner to trademark protection, so long as they function to identify the source of goods or services. Examples of successfully registered marks include the Coca-Cola Company’s #Smilewithacoke and Mucinex’s #Blamemucas.
As social media hashtags have grown in popularity, their business value has also grown. If your company has successfully incorporated social media hashtags into your marketing campaigns, it may be time to think about protecting their intellectual property value as well. In addition to deterring others from using similar marks, owners of registered trademarks are entitled to sue for damages in federal court.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!