Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 13, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA new rule regarding electronic trademark application submissions will take effect on February 15, 2020. To ensure that your submissions to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are accepted, it is important to understand the new requirements.
Under the USPTO’s final rule, trademark applicants and registrants will be required to file trademark applications and related documents using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). The USPTO’s goal is to make the trademark registration process entirely electronic.
The rule also requires the designation of an email address for receiving USPTO correspondence concerning these submissions, which will be either that of the applicant or registrant (if unrepresented) or an authorized attorney. Trademark applicants and registrants must also provide and maintain an accurate postal address to ensure that the USPTO can contact them if their email correspondence address doesn’t work.
There are some exceptions to the requirement to file electronically through TEAS. One involves submissions under the Trademark Law Treaty (TLT) and the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks (STLT). Nationals of TLT members that are not also members of STLT at the time of submission of the relevant document are not required to file electronically or receive communications from the USPTO via email.
The rule also allows for physical specimens to be submitted separately when it is not possible to submit them using TEAS given the nature of the mark. For instance, if the application or registration is for a scent or flavor mark, because the required specimen must show use, or continued use, of the scent or flavor, it cannot be uploaded electronically. In that situation, the applicant may submit the application through TEAS and indicate that it is mailing the specimen to the USPTO.
An applicant or registrant may file a petition to the Director requesting acceptance of a submission filed on paper in three situations: (1) when TEAS is unavailable on the date of the deadline for the submission; (2) when the party timely filed a paper submission, but is unable to resubmit the document electronically by the deadline; and (3) when an extraordinary circumstance prevented the party from submitting the document electronically.
Going forward, trademark owners should regularly monitor the USPTO’s electronic systems, particularly after filing a submission to the USPTO. It is also important to keep your contact information up-to-date.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!