
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: January 17, 2014

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently released a letter outlining its regulatory and examination priorities for 2014. It should be considered “must read” material for all broker dealers.
Susan Axelrod, Executive Vice President, Regulatory Operations, said, “The purpose of this letter is to provide insight to the industry on specific areas of concern for our regulatory programs in the coming year. We encourage firms to use this guidance along with their own analysis to enhance their programs as we will be examining for strong controls and robust compliance efforts in these areas.”
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority letter addresses a wide range of issues, including business conduct, fraud, financial and operational concerns, and market regulation. Below are some of the highlights:
New to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s exam priorities are so-called recidivist brokers, those who have a pattern of complaints or disclosures for sales practice abuses. The enhanced scrutiny means that firms should thoroughly investigate all new hires and have procedures in place for heightened supervision of brokers who may have questionable backgrounds. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority plans to use both its High Risk Broker initiative and its Broker Migration Model to focus its enforcement efforts.
In the wake of several high-profile data breaches impacting the financial industry, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority plans to assess the integrity of firms’ policies, procedures, and controls to protect sensitive customer data. Accordingly, firms should evaluate and test their current data protection procedures to detect and address any potential weaknesses.
As the market for initial public offerings (IPOs) continues to heat up, examiners will be keeping a close eye on firms entering the underwriting business or significantly expanding their activities in this area. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority specifically cites compliance with Rule 5131 which, among other things, prohibits quid pro quo allocations and “spinning,” and addresses the conduct of firms and associated persons in the areas of book-building, new issue pricing, penalty bids, trading and waivers of lock-up agreements, as primary concern.
Starting this year, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority will take enhanced steps to assess the funding and liquidity risks of regulated firms. Larger firms will be required to conduct liquidity stress tests, which will focus on the impact of a loss of funding for their proprietary positions, their repo book, settlement and depository payments, and funding of customer balances.
Citing algorithmic trading malfunctions that caused substantial market disruptions, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority plans to monitor whether firms’ testing and controls related to high-frequency trading (HFT) and other algorithmic trading strategies and trading systems are adequate in light of the Market Access Rule and firms’ other supervisory obligations. Oversight may be conducted through both examinations and targeted investigations, according to the letter.
Among other top concerns, the letter also addresses perennial favorites like suitability, conflicts of interest, complex products, and anti-money laundering efforts. Finally, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has indicated that it will update its view on risk throughout the year, and registered firms should do the same.
If you have any questions about Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s 2014 regulatory and examination priorities, please feel free to fill out the comment section below.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!