Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 8, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA lawsuit has pushed Major League Baseball to increase fan safety at MLB games.
While all major league baseball stadiums in the U.S. do have safety netting behind home plate, the amount varies and there are seats that may be considered dangerous located elsewhere. An Oakland Athletics season-ticket holder filed a class action lawsuit in July, asking that the league’s teams improve safety measures for fans. Though MLB filed a motion for dismissal in October, the litigation must have had some sort of effect, because Commissioner Robert Manfred recently suggested that teams extend safety netting in their ballparks.
“The Baseball Rule” has long existed to protect teams from lawsuits. The rule assumes that individuals who purchase tickets to a baseball game are going to the event to watch the sport. This means it is on the fans to recognize when a ball or shard from a broken bat is flying toward them. This assumption may have been sensible years ago, but these days there are myriad in-game distractions that may cause fans to take their eyes away from the action for a short period, such as smart phones or ballpark amenities. The changes in how fans view the game in-person have led to questions about the validity of the Baseball Rule in the modern game. Now Manfred is making an effort to improve fan safety by suggesting teams extend nets, though there is still some onus on the fans, as evidenced by a planned education program.
Regarding netting, Manfred suggested that teams extend the barriers to their ballparks’ dugouts. While the suggested changes aren’t extensive, they are a sign that MLB understands that fan safety is in decline at ballparks and the league is responsible for doing something about that. The Baseball Rule may still be in effect for many fans who attend games, but next season here will be a slight increase in those who can take comfort in the fact that they’re seated behind a protective net.
Whether the league decides to mandate the extension of netting or implementation other fan safety measures in the future is less certain. Even with the larger nets, there will be a large number of fans in-danger of being hit by bat debris or foul balls come the 2016 season.
If you believe you were wrongfully injured while attending a baseball game, or that you are in danger at future games you plan to view, talk to an experienced for more on fan safety and the Baseball Rule.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!