
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: July 11, 2017

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comNew Jersey lawmakers are considering legislation that would subject businesses engaging in soil and debris recycling services to the same regulation and oversight that applies to the solid waste industry.

The bill, Senate Bill Number 2306, would also expand the definition of “key employees” that must submit to background checks to include sales persons, consultants, and brokers.
Pursuant to N.J.S.A., any business that collects, transports or disposes of solid or hazardous waste in New Jersey must obtain and maintain an A-901 license, which requires detailed disclosures by the business and key employees during the application process. Owners, managers, officers and other “key employees” must submit to a fingerprint check, and undergo a background investigation. The primary goal of the A-901 licensing program is to keep organized crime and other criminal elements out of the state’s solid waste industry.
Senate Bill Number 2306 amends the existing law to expand the requirement for background checks to a broader range of persons involved in the solid waste industry. As amended, the definition of “key employee” would include “any family member of an officer, director, partner, or key employee, employed by the applicant or permittee; or any broker, consultant or sales person employed by, or who do business with, the applicant, permittee, or licensee, with respect to the solid waste, hazardous waste, or recycling operations of the business concern.”
Senate Bill Number 2306 also purports to address the lack of licensing requirements and regulatory standards for individuals and entities engaged in most forms of recycling. As initially drafted, the legislation would have subjected the entire recycling industry to the same regulation and oversight as the solid waste industry. However, it was most recently amended to include only individuals or business concerns who engage in soil and debris recycling services.
Pursuant to the bill, soil and debris recycling services include the recycling of: (1) source-separated, non-putrescible, waste material resulting from construction, remodeling, repair, and demolition operations on houses, commercial buildings, pavements and other structures; (2) source-separated, non-putrescible waste concrete, asphalt, brick, block, asphalt-based roofing, scrap wood, and wood waste; and (3) soil.
The proposed legislation would prohibit the issuance of an A-901 license to persons debarred from operating in other states. It would also ban individuals otherwise deemed unsuitable for the solid waste or recycling industries, convicted felons, and others of questionable character from holding an indirect, non-licensed stake in a solid waste or recycling business.
The bill would consolidate A-901 responsibilities within the Office of the Attorney General. Currently, the Department of Environmental Protection and the Office of the Attorney General share the regulatory burden. It would also require the Department of Environmental Protection, the Department of the Treasury, and the Attorney General to take steps to establish a records management system that will make it more efficient to collect, store, and share information on the solid waste and recycling industries, as well as their current and prospective license and permit holders. The bill would require the Attorney General to establish a reciprocal information exchange system with the State of New York and other states in the region to facilitate information sharing on the solid waste and recycling industries.
Finally, the bill would require the Department of Treasury to establish a centralized list in of individuals and corporate entities who have been debarred by various State agencies from participation in a number of regulated industries apart from solid waste and recycling, such as construction, the casino gaming industry, and transportation. As noted in the statement accompanying the bill, this requirement will “ensure that the status of persons and businesses deemed unfit to work under one agency’s purview is made known to all other appropriate agencies.”
We encourage readers to stay tuned for updates regarding S2306, and to contact experienced counsel to determine how the new requirements of this proposed bill may impact your business. If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!