
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: February 13, 2019

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comOn January 24, 2019, the Senate Environment and Energy committee unanimously voted to advance Senate Bill 1700 (S1700), and it now heads to the Senate Budget and Appropriation Committee for additional consideration.

While similar bills have been introduced over the past several years, they failed to gain traction. The likelihood of passage is arguably greater now that environmental justice is a top priority of the Murphy Administration.
S1700 would require entities seeking environmental permits for power plants, resource recovery facilities or incinerators, sewage treatment plants, transfer stations, recycling centers, landfills and similar facilities to meet certain additional requirements before obtaining a permit if the facility is located in a “burdened community.” The term “burdened community” is defined as any census tract, as delineated in the most recent federal decennial census, that is ranked in the bottom 33 percent of census tracts in the State for median household income.
Meanwhile, “facility” is defined as any: (1) electric generating facility with a capacity of more than ten megawatts; (2) resource recovery facility or incinerator; (3) sludge combustor or incinerator; (4) sewage treatment plant with a capacity of more than 50 million gallons per day; (5) transfer station, recycling center, or other solid waste facility with a combined monthly volume in excess of 25 tons; (6) landfill, including, but not limited to, a landfill that accepts ash, construction or demolition debris, or solid waste; (7) medical waste incinerator; or (8) major source of air pollution, as defined by the federal Clean Air Act.
Specifically, Senate Bill 1700 provides that, beginning 180 days after its enactment, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) would not be permitted to grant certain environmental permits for any new facility, or for the expansion of an existing facility, located in whole or in part in a burdened community, unless the permit applicant first:
Under S1700, the NJDEP would not be permitted to issue a decision on the permit application until at least 60 days after the public hearing. More importantly, the agency would have the authority to deny a permit application in a burdened community upon a finding that approval of the permit, together with the cumulative impacts posed by the proposed new or expanded facility, would constitute an unreasonable risk to the health of the residents of the burdened community and to the environment in that community. The DEP, when evaluating an application for a permit under the bill, would be required to assess community support for the proposed new or expanded facility, and be required to consider such support, or the lack thereof, in its decision to grant or deny a permit.
As originally drafted, S1700 would have authorized the governing body of a municipality to prevent the NJDEP from issuing a permit for a new or expanded facility. However, the version that the Senate committee approved omits the provision.
Environmental groups support the New Jersey environmental justice legislation. “For far too long, we have dumped these facilities that no one wants in these communities,’’ said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club. “For the first time, this bill puts teeth into environmental justice measures.’’ However, business groups maintain that the bill will add another layer of bureaucracy to the environmental permitting process, resulting in both delays and higher costs.
The attorneys of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Environmental Law Group will continue to monitor the progress of the bill and post updates.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!