Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 3, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNow that cold weather is here to stay, flu season is officially upon us. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) estimates that there are between 9.2 million and 35.6 million flu-related illnesses each year in the United States. If the past few years are any indication of what to expect, this flu season is likely to be a rough one.
Schools, nursing homes, workplaces, and other places where large groups congregate daily are particularly vulnerable to flu outbreaks. For employers, flu season can result in high rates of absenteeism and decreased productivity. Therefore, it’s natural for employers to want to use every means available to help maintain a healthy workplace. While many employees get a yearly flu shot in hopes of fending off the flu, it is important to understand when flu shot policies can lead to employer liability.
State laws on flu vaccination vary. Eighteen (18) states have enacted flu vaccination requirements for hospital healthcare workers, and sixteen (16) states establish requirements for hospital patients. At present, New Jersey only mandates flu shots for small children. New Jersey does not require workers, even those in the healthcare industry, to get vaccinated against influenza.
In the absence of regulations, employers are free to establish their own flu vaccination policies. However, to avoid facing legal liability, mandatory flu vaccination policies must provide for exceptions, as well as outline the steps that workers must take to rely on them.
An employee may be entitled to an exemption from a mandatory vaccination requirement based on a medical condition that prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), employers must provide employees a reasonable accommodation barring undue hardship, i.e. significant difficulty or expense.
Similarly, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, once an employer receives notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents him or her from receiving the influenza vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation, unless such accommodation would pose more than a de minimis hardship.
Terminating an employee for failing to get vaccinated can lead to liability, particularly if the employee cites a medical reason or religious objection to not receiving the flu shot. In recent years, employers with mandatory flu shot policies have faced wrongful termination suits by workers as well as agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Earlier this year, Saint Thomas Health (STH) – which operates Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital in Murfreesboro, Tennessee – agreed to pay $75,000 to settle a religious discrimination lawsuit filed by the EEOC. According to the suit, in 2013 and 2014, STH allowed the employee at the center of the suit to opt out of its mandatory flu shot policy and wear a protective mask instead. The accommodation was based on his religious beliefs. However, when the employee requested the accommodation in 2015, STH refused to let him work at the hospital if he didn’t get the shot, and he was ultimately terminated.
In addition to paying $75,000 in compensatory damages to the employee, STH must modify its accommodation policy to allow an employee to appeal the termination of an accommodation for a sincerely held religious belief. In a press statement announcing the settlement, the EEOC stated that “[a]n employer should not force an employee to choose between employment and his religious belief unless doing so would cause an undue hardship to the employer.”
Employers can strongly recommend that employees get a flu shot. They can also help facilitate the process by holding a free flu shot clinic or offering “prizes” for workers who elect to get vaccinated.
Employers may also encourage employees to telework (i.e., work from home) as an infection-control strategy. In addition, employees with disabilities that result in a high risk of complications from influenza may request working remotely as a reasonable accommodation to reduce their chances of infection during a flu outbreak.
Employers can and should encourage employees to adopt common-sense infection control practices, such as regular hand washing, coughing and sneezing etiquette, and proper tissue usage and disposal. Trying to “tough it out” puts healthy workers at risk and increases the risks of a wide-spread outbreak in the workplace. Therefore, employees should be sent home at the first sign of illness.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Gregg Hilzer, at the 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Breach of contract disputes are the most common type of business litigation. Therefore, nearly all New York and New Jersey businesses will likely have to deal with a contract dispute at least once. Understanding when to file a breach of contract lawsuit and how long you have to sue for breach of contract is essential […]
Author: Brittany P. Tarabour
Closing your business can be a difficult and challenging task. For corporations, the process includes formal approval of the dissolution, winding up operations, resolving tax liabilities, and filing all required paperwork. Whether you need to understand how to dissolve a corporation in New York or New Jersey, it’s imperative to take all of the proper […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!