Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 3, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNow that cold weather is here to stay, flu season is officially upon us. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) estimates that there are between 9.2 million and 35.6 million flu-related illnesses each year in the United States. If the past few years are any indication of what to expect, this flu season is likely to be a rough one.

Schools, nursing homes, workplaces, and other places where large groups congregate daily are particularly vulnerable to flu outbreaks. For employers, flu season can result in high rates of absenteeism and decreased productivity. Therefore, it’s natural for employers to want to use every means available to help maintain a healthy workplace. While many employees get a yearly flu shot in hopes of fending off the flu, it is important to understand when flu shot policies can lead to employer liability.
State laws on flu vaccination vary. Eighteen (18) states have enacted flu vaccination requirements for hospital healthcare workers, and sixteen (16) states establish requirements for hospital patients. At present, New Jersey only mandates flu shots for small children. New Jersey does not require workers, even those in the healthcare industry, to get vaccinated against influenza.
In the absence of regulations, employers are free to establish their own flu vaccination policies. However, to avoid facing legal liability, mandatory flu vaccination policies must provide for exceptions, as well as outline the steps that workers must take to rely on them.
An employee may be entitled to an exemption from a mandatory vaccination requirement based on a medical condition that prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), employers must provide employees a reasonable accommodation barring undue hardship, i.e. significant difficulty or expense.
Similarly, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, once an employer receives notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents him or her from receiving the influenza vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation, unless such accommodation would pose more than a de minimis hardship.
Terminating an employee for failing to get vaccinated can lead to liability, particularly if the employee cites a medical reason or religious objection to not receiving the flu shot. In recent years, employers with mandatory flu shot policies have faced wrongful termination suits by workers as well as agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Earlier this year, Saint Thomas Health (STH) – which operates Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital in Murfreesboro, Tennessee – agreed to pay $75,000 to settle a religious discrimination lawsuit filed by the EEOC. According to the suit, in 2013 and 2014, STH allowed the employee at the center of the suit to opt out of its mandatory flu shot policy and wear a protective mask instead. The accommodation was based on his religious beliefs. However, when the employee requested the accommodation in 2015, STH refused to let him work at the hospital if he didn’t get the shot, and he was ultimately terminated.
In addition to paying $75,000 in compensatory damages to the employee, STH must modify its accommodation policy to allow an employee to appeal the termination of an accommodation for a sincerely held religious belief. In a press statement announcing the settlement, the EEOC stated that “[a]n employer should not force an employee to choose between employment and his religious belief unless doing so would cause an undue hardship to the employer.”
Employers can strongly recommend that employees get a flu shot. They can also help facilitate the process by holding a free flu shot clinic or offering “prizes” for workers who elect to get vaccinated.
Employers may also encourage employees to telework (i.e., work from home) as an infection-control strategy. In addition, employees with disabilities that result in a high risk of complications from influenza may request working remotely as a reasonable accommodation to reduce their chances of infection during a flu outbreak.
Employers can and should encourage employees to adopt common-sense infection control practices, such as regular hand washing, coughing and sneezing etiquette, and proper tissue usage and disposal. Trying to “tough it out” puts healthy workers at risk and increases the risks of a wide-spread outbreak in the workplace. Therefore, employees should be sent home at the first sign of illness.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Gregg Hilzer, at the 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!