Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 6, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAs speculated on our BusinessLaw blog, the U.S. Department of Labor recently made a major announcement to increase the minimum weekly wage level for salaried workers eligible for overtime pay. According to National Law Review, as of Dec. 1, companies across the U.S. will face significant changes in payroll. In fact, the salary threshold will increase from $455 to $913 per week, which breaks out to nearly $47,500 per year – up from close to $24,000 annually.
So how do companies adjust? There will likely be a jump in wage and hour lawsuits, which have been on the rise over the past decade. This increase could not only significantly increase the damages and attorney’s fees for defense expenses, but these costs can also exceed the amount of wages in dispute. These extra expenses will come as the result of claims available under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
With these increases in potential liabilities coupled with the increases in overtime pay, companies will need to adjust their compensation levels.
Companies with workers that will be impacted by the new overtime pay rules will need to figure out how to adjust their total compensation. This may include a number of different options, most notably increasing salary levels for those workers so that they reach exempt status.
For many companies, this might not be a feasible option. These firms may decide to convert salary workers to hourly levels to be divided by the standard 40 hour work week. Another option is converting workers from salary to hourly, and then dividing this by the total hours worked in a week.
Another alternative would be to convert workers from salary to fluctuating workweeks. This would effectively enable a company to pay an employee for only hours worked. Some weeks would be less hours, while others would be more.
Finally, an option that companies have is to offer non-discretionary bonuses or commission packages for workers. The new regulations allow these companies to pay up to 10 percent of the new minimum salary amount. This would effectively allow a company to have a worker under non-exempt status but compensate the employee for overtime pay under a commission structure for more work on fewer hours.
Employers need to determine the economic impact of the new rules on executive, administrative and professional-level employees within their organizations. There are alternatives for companies to convert their workers to exempt statuses or shift their compensation schedules for fear of incurring significant increases in overtime pay.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!