As it turns out, Snapchat messages do stick around. While this may not mean much to those over the age of 25, the company’s resulting settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) offers several useful lessons for New York and New Jersey businesses.
Snapchat is a mobile messaging application that allows users to send photos, video, and texts that have a predetermined shelf life of one to ten seconds. After the set time limit expires, the messages are supposed to “disappear forever” after being deleted from the recipient’s device and Snapchat’s servers.
The FTC Complaint In its complaint, the FTC alleged that the messages could be retained in several ways. Recipients can take screenshots of the message, use third party apps to view and save messages, and access video messages stored outside the app’s “sandbox” by connecting the device to a computer.
The agency further maintained that Snapchat deceived consumers over the amount of personal data it collected. For instance, although the company’s privacy policy stated that it did not “ask for, track, or access any location-specific information from [a user’s] device at any time,” geolocation information was collected from Android users’ who activated the “Find Friends” feature. The app also collected iOS users’ contact information from their address books without notice or consent.
The FTC also alleged that Snapchat failed to take proper security measures to protect user data from misuse and unauthorized disclosure. During a recent attack, hackers were able to breach the app’s Find Friends feature and access a database of 4.6 million Snapchat usernames and phone numbers.
The Terms of the Settlement Agreement Under the terms of its settlement agreement with the FTC, Snapchat is prohibited from “misrepresenting the extent to which it maintains the privacy, security, or confidentiality of users’ information.” The app company will also be required to implement a comprehensive privacy program that will be monitored by an independent privacy professional for the next 20 years.
The Message for New York and New Jersey Businesses According to the FTC, the Snapchat enforcement action is part of an ongoing crackdown on mobile app privacy.
“If a company markets privacy and security as key selling points in pitching its service to consumers, it is critical that it keep those promises,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. “Any company that makes misrepresentations to consumers about its privacy and security practices risks FTC action.”
As this case highlights, privacy policies cannot be an afterthought when designing a mobile application. Companies must carefully consider how they will collect and protect consumers’ personal information and follow through with those promises.
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
