Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Cyber Sting Reveals Corporate Vulnerabilities to BEC Scams

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 5, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

The DOJ Recently Enacted a Crackdown on BEC Scams, Netting 74 Arrests

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a global cyber sting operation that netted 74 arrests. The crackdown specifically targeted Business Email Compromise (BEC) scams, which pose a growing threat to businesses of all sizes. A BEC is when a hacker gains access to a corporate email account and spoofs the owner’s identity to defraud the company or its employees, customers, or partners of money, etc.

Cyber Sting Reveals Corporate Vulnerabilities to BEC Scams
Photo courtesy of Rayi Christian Wicaksono (Unsplash.com)

According to a press statement by the DOJ, “Operation Wire Wire” involved a coordinated law enforcement effort with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. The operation, which was conducted over a six-month period, resulted in the seizure of nearly $2.4 million, and the disruption and recovery of approximately $14 million in fraudulent wire transfers.

In one case, the defendant gained access to email accounts belonging to a Massachusetts real estate attorney and sent emails to recipients that “spoofed” the real estate attorney’s account in an attempt to cause the email recipient to transfer nearly $500,000, which was intended to be used for payment in connection with a real estate transaction, to a shell account controlled by the defendant. Another case involved 23 individuals charged in the Southern District of Florida with laundering at least $10 million from proceeds of BEC scams, including approximately $1.4 million from a victim corporation in Seattle, as well as various title companies and a law firm.

The Hallmarks of a BEC Scam

BEC scams often target businesses working with foreign suppliers and/or businesses that regularly perform wire transfer payments. They also seek out businesses or law firms involved in large deals or real estate transactions. The perpetrators compromise legitimate business e-mail accounts through social engineering or computer intrusion techniques to conduct unauthorized transfers of funds.

There are several versions of the BEC fraud. In one common scam, a business, which often has a long-standing relationship with a supplier, is asked to wire funds for invoice payment to an alternate, fraudulent account. Another scam involves hacking into the e-mail accounts of high-level business executives and using the compromised account to send a wire transfer request to a second employee within the company who is normally responsible for processing these requests or directly to the financial institution.

BEC scams can take a variety of other forms. For instance, they may involve fraudulent requests for checks rather than wire transfers, and they may target sensitive information such as personally identifiable information (PII) or employee tax records instead of, or in addition to, money. In addition, they do not always involve an actual “compromise” of an email account or computer network. 

Because BEC scams are often fairly sophisticated, they can be difficult to detect. Perpetrators often monitor and gather information about their victims for several months prior to launching an attack. Accordingly, the e-mail requests for a wire transfer are well written and specific to the business being victimized. In addition, the dollar amounts requested are similar to normal business transaction amounts in an effort to avoid suspicion.

How to Prevent Falling Victim to a BEC Scam

Business email compromise scams can significantly hurt your bottom-line by not only causing financial losses, but also by harming your business relationships with clients and vendors. Given the risks, here are several tips for safeguarding your company against these attacks:

  • Avoid using free, web-based e-mail accounts to conduct business.
  • Beware of what your business posts to social media and company websites, especially job duties/descriptions, hierarchal information, and out of office details.
  • Train employees not open e-mail from unknown senders, click on links in the e-mail, or open attachments.
  • Do not use the “Reply” option to respond to any business e-mails. Instead, use the “Forward” option and either type in the correct e-mail address or select it from the e-mail address book to ensure the intended recipient’s correct e-mail address is used.
  • Implement comprehensive policies regarding wire transfer requests that specifically address how to handle requests to change a wire recipient’s account information, requests to add a new recipient, or requests that take place outside of the normal channels.
  • Create intrusion detection system rules that flag e-mails with extensions that are similar to company e-mail. For example, legitimate e-mail of com would flag fraudulent e-mail of abc-company.com.
  • Register all company domains that are slightly different than the actual company domain.
  • Verify changes in vendor payment location by adding additional two-factor authentication such as having a secondary sign- off by company personnel.
  • Confirm requests for transfers of funds. When using phone verification as part of the two-factor authentication, use previously known numbers, not the numbers provided in the e-mail request.
  • Know the habits of your customers, including the details of, reasons behind, and amount of payments.
  • Carefully scrutinize all e-mail requests for transfer of funds to determine if the requests are out of the ordinary.

For businesses, it can be difficult to keep track of the increasing number of cyber threats. As they say in sports, the best defense is a good offense. That means making it as difficult as possible for cyber criminals to target your business and being ready to respond should you still fall victim to an attack.

Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo. If you have any questions about this post, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide (http://ewhwblog.com).

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses post image

New York NDA Requirements for Businesses

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "New York NDA Requirements for Businesses"
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained post image

New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained"
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors post image

Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors"
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies post image

SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies"
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses post image

Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]

Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

Link to post with title - "Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses"
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!