
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 19, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comPatriot Coal Corp. announced that it is currently on pace to emerge from protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law by the end of the year. The announcement follows a U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s ruling approving the company’s disclosure statement and allowing the company to solicit votes from its various classes on creditors on the approval of its proposed plan of reorganization.
In the recent ruling, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri confirmed that the company’s proposed disclosure statement contained the necessary information needed to solicit votes from the creditors, and also affirmed that the company may move forward with its proposed rights offering. Further, the court approved an agreement among Patriot Coal, Barclays Bank, and Deutsche Bank, under which the financial institutions will provide $576 million in exit financing and post-emergence credit.
The court’s ruling was viewed as a major milestone in Patriot’s long-awaited exit from bankruptcy, following months of wrangling with union employees in disputes that included worker strikes, lengthy negotiations, and cost-cutting measures. Earlier in the year, the court gave the company permission to dissolve collective bargaining agreements and drastically cut worker benefits. Under the coal company’s proposed plan, retiree benefits will be reduced, and existing employees may face cuts in salary, vacation time, and other benefits. Additionally, the company will no longer directly manage employee health benefits, which will instead be transferred to an outside trust, according to Reuters.
“Today’s actions by the court represent important milestones on Patriot’s path to emergence as a strong, well-capitalized competitor in the coal industry,” said Patriot president and CEO Bennett Hatfield. “Taken together, the Rights Offering and the settlements with Peabody and Arch lay the foundation for completion of our exit financing in the next few weeks. We remain on schedule for emergence from bankruptcy in mid to late December.”
The agreement also allows for a rights offering backstopped by Knighthead Capital Management, which is expected to raise roughly $250 million in new capital.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!