Commercial evictions in New Jersey are poised to increase under new orders issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court...
Commercial evictions in New Jersey are poised to increase under new orders issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court. While most eviction proceedings were placed on “pause” in light of COVID-19, commercial landlords and lenders may now proceed with certain landlord/tenant actions and post-judgment actions in commercial foreclosures.
Impact of COVID-19 on Commercial Real Estate Matters
In response to the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency, the Supreme Court of New Jersey has authorized the temporary suspension of landlord/tenant trials, subject to a few narrow exceptions, since March 16, 2020. In July 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an order that allowed commercial or residential landlords to make an application for an eviction trial in certain emergency situations, including if a tenant was destroying the property or engaged in illegal activity. While commercial foreclosure trials have continued during the pandemic, the courts have withheld post-judgment action, including the issuance of writs of possession.
While these restrictions have provided welcome relief for commercial tenants, they have made it difficult for landlords to regain possession of commercial properties, even when tenant businesses are no longer operational. Lenders have also been left in limbo with regard to whether they may proceed with foreclosures.
Commercial Foreclosure Notice
In a Notice to the Bar, dated February 5, 2021, the New Jersey judiciary announced that, effective February 15, 2021, courts will resume post-trial activity, including issuance of writs of possession, for commercial foreclosure matters.
The announcement is likely unwelcome news for commercial property owners that are behind on mortgage payments. At the same time, it is a necessary step towards returning the legal system to its pre-pandemic operating status. By allowing actions to proceed through the legal process, it will also bring clarity for borrowers and lenders.
Commercial Landlord/Tenant Trials
In a second Notice to the Bar, dated February 5, 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified and expanded the circumstances in which a landlord may apply by Order to Show Cause for a trial in a commercial landlord/tenant matter.
Under the Order, a commercial landlord filing an Order to Show Cause must still allege emergent circumstances, and the basis of the landlord/tenant action generally can’t be nonpayment of rent. However, emergent circumstances can now exist where the tenant has vacated the property; the tenant’s business is not operating and will not resume operations; or the commercial landlord is facing foreclosure or a tax lien.
In such cases, the court will evaluate the application and determine whether emergent circumstances exist, and a hearing will be held. If the court finds that emergent circumstances exist, the commercial tenant will be notified, and a trial will be scheduled. After that trial, if the commercial landlord prevails, judgment will be entered, and a warrant of removal can be issued.
Key Takeaway
The Orders will not lead to a rash of commercial evictions overnight. However, the easing of restrictions does mean that parties to landlord/tenant and commercial foreclosure actions may need to shift their legal strategies.
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and we slowly approach the “new normal,” additional orders are likely. We encourage lenders/borrowers and tenants/ landlords to stay up-to-date on legal developments at both the state and local level and contact experienced counsel to determine how you may be impacted.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Chris Dzwilewski, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
