
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: December 20, 2017
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comWhile sometimes mistakenly dismissed as “boilerplate,” businesses should never overlook the importance of clearly drafted indemnification provisions. In interpreting your contracts, you should be aware that an indemnification clause is to be desired if you are being indemnified, and to be avoided, if possible, if you are being asked to indemnify.
The definition of “indemnity” is that you have a legal duty to make good on any loss, damage or liability incurred by someone else. So, when you agree to accept an obligation to indemnify, for example, in a finance or sale transaction contract, the risk shifts from the other party to the contract directly onto your back. Below is an example of a basic indemnification provision, with the caveat that many are far more complex:
“Each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from and against any loss, cost, or damage of any kind (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) to the extent arising out of its breach of this Agreement, and/or its negligence or willful misconduct.”
Not only are indemnification clauses capable of radically shifting risk from one contracting party to the other, they can also be used as a threat in litigation. Consequently, they are at once both the most desirable of “boilerplate” provisions in commercial contracts and the toughest to negotiate. Other than price and terms, indemnification clause negotiations are the most common deal breakers in contract negotiations and the most hotly contested clauses when there is a dispute and litigation arises.
Indemnification clauses are commonly found in agreements where the risks associated with a party’s non-performance, breach, or misconduct are great. While you may not be able to avoid all indemnification liability, it is possible to limit the scope. For instance, clauses may be drafted to cap liability at a certain amount, to require advance notice, to restrict liability to third-party claims or other specified losses, or to restrict the right to indemnification to a limited time period.
Negotiating the indemnification “dance” involves maneuvering the other party into accepting broad potential liability while keeping yourself clear of as much risk exposure as possible. While relative bargaining power is a key factor, other considerations include affordable liability insurance and the nature of the business risks.
Contracts often include a reference to indemnification for the legal fees and costs arising from a future issue. We recently defeated such a claim that a major international bank brought against our client in federal court, seeking indemnification of over two million dollars in legal fees and costs incurred by the bank in a litigation over a denial of funding. The court agreed with my argument that the indemnification clause was so broadly worded that our client would have had to pay the bank’s legal fees, even if the bank’s claim for indemnification was defeated.
As this case highlights, ambiguous contract provisions can often lead to business litigation. If you are seeking to be indemnified, don’t make the same mistake that the bank’s counsel made – be clear and specific about what is and what is not being indemnified. If not, it will be the court, rather than the parties, that decides how to interpret the agreement.
If you are being indemnified too broadly, when push comes to shove, a court may find the indemnification too loosely drafted to be enforceable. Therefore, it is imperative to work with an experienced business attorney to make sure that all provisions are clear and unequivocal.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!