
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: June 25, 2021

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
When New York legalized the recreational use of cannabis for adults 21 and over, it also amended the state’s off-duty conduct law. As amended, New York Labor Law § 201-d generally prevents employers from taking adverse actions in response to an employee’s use of cannabis outside the workplace.
New York’s off-duty conduct law prohibits discrimination against employees based on their lawful off-duty conduct and applies to all employers with employees in New York. Covered conduct includes political activities, the legal use of consumable products, such as alcohol and tobacco, and other legal recreational activities outside work hours and off the employer’s premises. “Work hours” is defined as “all time, including paid and unpaid breaks and meal periods, that the employee is suffered, permitted or expected to be engaged in work, and all time the employee is actually engaged in work.”
New York Labor Law § 201-d contains several exceptions. For instance, it does not protect activity that creates a material conflict of interest related to the employer’s trade secrets, proprietary information or other proprietary or business interest. Additionally, an employer does not violate the law when it takes action based on the belief either that: (i) the employer’s actions were required by statute, regulation, ordinance or other governmental mandate, (ii) the employer’s actions were permissible pursuant to an established substance abuse or alcohol program or workplace policy, professional contract or collective bargaining agreement, or (iii) the individual’s actions were deemed by an employer or previous employer to be illegal or to constitute habitually poor performance, incompetency or misconduct.
On March 31, 2021, Gov. Andrew Cuomo legalized recreational cannabis by signing the New York Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA) into law. The MRTA includes several provisions that address legal cannabis use by employees.
With regard to off-duty cannabis use, New York Labor Law § 201-d now makes it unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire, employ or license, or to discharge from employment or otherwise discriminate against an individual because of:
The MRTA also adds new cannabis-related exceptions to the off-duty law. Employers do not violate the law when taking an action related to the use of cannabis in the following circumstances:
Because the amendments took effect immediately, employers should review their employee policies and procedures, including employee handbooks, to determine what changes may be necessary. It is important to note that while the MRTA prohibits employers for taking an adverse action in response to off-duty recreational cannabis use, it does not prohibit them from maintaining a drug-free workplace. Accordingly, employers may still prohibit workers from using, consuming, or possessing cannabis during work hours or on the business premises. As noted above, the new exceptions related to cannabis also allow employers to discipline employees for on-the-job impairment.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!