
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: June 25, 2021

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
When New York legalized the recreational use of cannabis for adults 21 and over, it also amended the state’s off-duty conduct law. As amended, New York Labor Law § 201-d generally prevents employers from taking adverse actions in response to an employee’s use of cannabis outside the workplace.
New York’s off-duty conduct law prohibits discrimination against employees based on their lawful off-duty conduct and applies to all employers with employees in New York. Covered conduct includes political activities, the legal use of consumable products, such as alcohol and tobacco, and other legal recreational activities outside work hours and off the employer’s premises. “Work hours” is defined as “all time, including paid and unpaid breaks and meal periods, that the employee is suffered, permitted or expected to be engaged in work, and all time the employee is actually engaged in work.”
New York Labor Law § 201-d contains several exceptions. For instance, it does not protect activity that creates a material conflict of interest related to the employer’s trade secrets, proprietary information or other proprietary or business interest. Additionally, an employer does not violate the law when it takes action based on the belief either that: (i) the employer’s actions were required by statute, regulation, ordinance or other governmental mandate, (ii) the employer’s actions were permissible pursuant to an established substance abuse or alcohol program or workplace policy, professional contract or collective bargaining agreement, or (iii) the individual’s actions were deemed by an employer or previous employer to be illegal or to constitute habitually poor performance, incompetency or misconduct.
On March 31, 2021, Gov. Andrew Cuomo legalized recreational cannabis by signing the New York Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA) into law. The MRTA includes several provisions that address legal cannabis use by employees.
With regard to off-duty cannabis use, New York Labor Law § 201-d now makes it unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire, employ or license, or to discharge from employment or otherwise discriminate against an individual because of:
The MRTA also adds new cannabis-related exceptions to the off-duty law. Employers do not violate the law when taking an action related to the use of cannabis in the following circumstances:
Because the amendments took effect immediately, employers should review their employee policies and procedures, including employee handbooks, to determine what changes may be necessary. It is important to note that while the MRTA prohibits employers for taking an adverse action in response to off-duty recreational cannabis use, it does not prohibit them from maintaining a drug-free workplace. Accordingly, employers may still prohibit workers from using, consuming, or possessing cannabis during work hours or on the business premises. As noted above, the new exceptions related to cannabis also allow employers to discipline employees for on-the-job impairment.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!