Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Understanding the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Author: Robert E. Levy

Date: July 24, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Businesses Must Follow Certain Rules When Attempting to Collect a Debt

If a collection company calls you repeatedly, threatens litigation or tells you it can cause you to lose your driver’s license, or contacts you or your employer after you write and tell them to stop harassing you, the collection company is violating laws and rules applicable to the collection industry. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), businesses must follow certain rules when attempting to collect a debt. The federal law also imposes penalties for violations and provides protections for debtors.

Understanding the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Photo courtesy of Sharon McCutcheon (Unsplash.com)

What Types of Debts Are Covered?

The FDCPA covers personal, family, and household debts, including money you owe on a personal credit card account, an auto loan, a medical bill, and your mortgage. The federal law doesn’t cover any debts incurred in the operation of a business.

Who Is Considered a Debt Collector?

Under the FDCPA, a debt collector is someone who regularly collects debts owed to others. Collection agencies, attorneys who collect debts on a regular basis, and companies that buy delinquent debts and then try to collect them all fall under this definition and are subject to the law’s requirements.

Can You Prevent Debt Collectors from Contacting You?

Debt collectors can contact debtors by a variety of means, including phone, letter, email, or text message, when seeking to collect a debt; however, they must disclose that they are debt collectors and may not contact debtors at inconvenient times or places, such as before 8 in the morning or after 9 at night, unless the debtor agrees. They also may not contact debtors at work after being notified that the debtor is not allowed to receive such calls.

Within five days of first contacting a debtor, a collector must send a written “validation notice” detailing how much is owed, the name of the creditor to whom the money is owed, and how to dispute the debt. To prevent future contact from the collector, debtors must send written notification within 30 days. The letter may also request additional information to verify the debt and/or state that the debtor disputes that all or some of the money is owed. Once the collector receives the letter, they may only contact you to confirm there will be no further contact or to let you know that they or the creditor intend to pursue further action, such as filing a lawsuit.

Debt collectors may only contact third parties, such as employers, neighbors, or relatives, to obtain the debtor’s contact information, i.e. current address. They may only discuss the debt with you, your spouse, and any co-signor on the debt. If you are represented by an attorney with respect to the debt, the debt collector must contact the attorney, rather than you.

What Other Practices Are Prohibited?

The FDCPA generally prohibits debt collectors from using abusive, unfair, or deceptive practices to collect debts. Below are several examples of prohibited conduct:

  • Harassment: Debt collectors may not harass, oppress, or abuse you or any third parties they contact. For example, they may not use threats of violence or harm; publish a list of names of people who refuse to pay their debts (but they can give this information to the credit reporting companies); use obscene or profane language; or repeatedly use the phone to annoy someone.
  • False Statements: Debt collectors may not make false or misleading statements when attempting to collect a debt. For example, they may not falsely claim that they are attorneys or government representatives; falsely claim that you have committed a crime; falsely represent that they operate or work for a credit reporting company; misrepresent the amount you owe; indicate that papers they send you are legal forms if they aren’t; or indicate that papers they send to you aren’t legal forms if they are.
  • Threats: Debt collectors also are prohibited from saying that you will be arrested if you don’t pay your debt; they’ll seize, garnish, attach, or sell your property or wages unless they are permitted by law to take the action and intend to do so; or legal action will be taken against you, if doing so would be illegal or if they don’t intend to take the action.
  • Unfair practices: Debt collectors may not engage in unfair practices when seeking to collect a debt. For example, they may not: try to collect any interest, fee, or other charge on top of the amount you owe unless the contract that created your debt – or your state law – allows the charge; deposit a post-dated check early; take or threaten to take your property unless it can be done legally; or contact you by postcard.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is tasked with enforcing the FDCPA. Debtors may also pursue legal action. Debtors must sue a collector in a state or federal court within one year from the date the law was violated. If successful, the collector may be required to pay for any damages suffered because of the illegal collection practices, like lost wages and medical bills. In addition, the court may order the debt collector to pay statutory damages of up to $1,000, even if you can’t prove that you suffered actual damages.

If you are facing the threat of legal action in a connection with a debt, it is imperative to consult an attorney experienced in creditor collections who can help you resolve the matter. For businesses, it is also advisable to work with legal counsel to ensure that your debt collection practices do not result in costly FDCPA violations.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!