Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Bondholders Confront CalPERS in San Bernardino Bankruptcy Case
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Creditors who are the city’s bondholders in the San Bernardino, California, bankruptcy case are displeased with the position taken by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System – or CalPERS – and they are taking their concerns to court.
The bondholders filed a legal protest against CalPERS, arguing that the pension fund is seeking preferential treatment in the bankruptcy case. In their 114-page protest, the bondholders said they have the same rights as the pension fund and are prepared to take the fight all the way to the Supreme Court to prevent CalPERS from obtaining permission from the court to sue the city on its pension obligations. They argue that allowing the pension fund to sue San Bernardino could result in tens of millions of dollars in losses for the Wall Street bondholders.
Immediately following San Bernardino’s appeal for Chapter 9 protection under bankruptcy law in August, CalPERS demanded the right to sue the city. San Bernardino fell behind on $6.9 million in pension payments after it filed for bankruptcy.
CalPERS group argues that the pension obligations of member cities must be met no matter what – an argument that encouraged the city of Vallejo to continue making payments following its bankruptcy in 2008, according to the Sacramento Bee. CalPERS said that California state law supports their bid to primacy, and that pension contributions cannot be reduced even in the event of bankruptcy.
Despite these arguments, the city said it plans to resume payments in July 2013, and also asks to restructure its current debt to lower the amount it must pay.
CalPERS is the city’s biggest creditor and San Bernardino’s unfunded pension obligations to the fund amount to $143.3 million, according to Reuters. Wall Street bondholders follow CalPERS as the city’s second biggest creditor, owning roughly $50 million in bonds.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know
For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law
As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions
In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What?
Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: George McGowan
Why Every Business Should Conduct an Annual Insurance Coverage Review
Most New Jersey business owners purchase insurance policies, file them away, and assume they are protected if a claim arises. Without a regular insurance coverage review, many companies discover gaps only after a lawsuit, cyberattack, property loss, or other significant event occurs. An annual insurance coverage review can help businesses identify potential risks, ensure their […]
Author: George McGowan
Demand Letters & Cease and Desist Letters: When to Send One (and When Not To)
Businesses and individuals often encounter situations where another party breaches a contract, fails to pay a debt, or continues harmful conduct. In many such disputes, a precisely drafted demand letter or cease-and-desist letter serves as a powerful legal tool. It can frequently resolve the dispute and avoid litigation. While demand or cease-and-desist letters can resolve […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.