Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Breach of Contract Explained: Types and Consequences

Authors: Brittany P. Tarabour, Dan Brecher

Date: April 10, 2025

Key Contacts

Back
Breach of Contract Explained: Types and Consequences

Breach of contract disputes are the most common type of business litigation. Therefore, nearly all New York and New Jersey businesses will likely have to deal with a contract dispute at least once. Understanding when to file a breach of contract lawsuit and how long you have to sue for breach of contract is essential for protecting your business interests.

To help you navigate the process and eliminate some stress that accompanies a contract breach, this article answers many of the top questions our clients ask, including:

  • What constitutes a breach of contract
  • What is a material breach
  • What remedies are available
  • How long do you have to sue for breach of contract

What Is a Breach of Contract?

A breach of contract is a legal claim asserted by one party against another for failing to fulfill the terms of a contract. Examples include a one party failing to deliver promised goods or services by the date set forth in the agreement or a party failing to make payments in accordance with terms of the contract.

Material v. Non-Material Breach

Contract breaches can generally be classified as material or non-material. The distinction is important because it impacts the legal recourse available to you.

A “material” breach is a breach so significant that it reaches the core of the agreement and negatively impacts its entire outcome. In contrast, a “non-material” breach often involves less important details. Often, it is obvious that a breach is material. For instance, if you hire a company to clean your office building twice a month, and they never show up, it is likely a material breach. But what happens if they miss one scheduled cleaning?

How Courts Determine if a Breach is Material

In situations that are less clear, courts consider several factors to determine whether a contract breach is material, including:

  • Progress of contract performance: A court is more likely to find a non-material breach in the later stages of an agreement
  • Extent of failure: The court will evaluate the losses suffered by the non-breaching party to determine if they impact the heart of the bargain. If so, it will generally find a material breach
  • Intent of parties: If the court finds that the breaching party acted unfairly or in bad faith, it is more likely to characterize the breach as material
  • Ease of rectification: If the problem could be remedied using reasonable effort and expense, the court is more likely to find a minor breach
  • Impact on breaching party: Even though the breaching party may be responsible for the problem, the court will still evaluate the severity of the impact (e.g., forfeiture) if the non-breaching party’s performance is excused
  • Contract provisions: In some cases, the terms of the contract specify what constitutes a material breach. The court will look to those provisions to make its determination

Once the type of breach is determined, you will have a better understanding of your potential remedies. After a material breach, the aggrieved party does not need to perform its part of the contract. It may also file a breach of contract lawsuit to recover any losses. If the contract breach is minor, the non-breaching party may only sue to recover damages.

Actual Breach vs. Anticipatory Breach

Contract breaches can also be categorized as an actual breach or an anticipatory breach. An actual breach occurs when one party fails to fully perform the terms of the contract. Meanwhile, an anticipatory breach is when a party states in advance that they will not be delivering on the terms of the contract.

A contract party facing an anticipatory breach has a range of options and does not need to wait for the other party to actually breach the agreement. The non-breaching party often has the right to immediately terminate the contract and may also seek compensation for their losses. In some cases, the non-breaching party may seek a court order compelling the breaching party to perform their obligations under the contract.

When Should You File a Breach of Contract Lawsuit?

If you have a contract with another person or entity and they fail to fulfill their obligations under the contract, you may be entitled to file a lawsuit to recover any damages that you lost as a result. However, before filing a breach of contract lawsuit, it is important to carefully review your contract to determine what steps, if any, you must take before filing suit. For example, contracts often allow the breaching party a reasonable amount of time to cure an alleged contract breach.

It is also advisable to consult with an attorney to determine if filing suit is your best course of action. Just because you can file a lawsuit does not always mean you should. In many cases, you may be able to negotiate a settlement with the other party that accounts for your losses without the time and expense of litigation.

How Long Do You Have to Sue for Breach of Contract?

To preserve your legal rights, it is imperative to file a breach of contract lawsuit within the applicable statute of limitations. Each state has enacted statutes prescribing a period of limitation for the bringing of certain types of legal action, with the goal of encouraging the resolution of legal claims within a reasonable amount of time. In New Jersey and New York, how long you have to sue for breach of contract is generally six years for most contracts.

Understanding this timeframe is critical, as missing the statute of limitations will likely prevent you from pursuing legal action regardless of how clear the breach may be.

Should You Consult an Attorney After a Contract Breach?

How you respond to a potential breach of contract can significantly impact your legal rights and the amount of compensation you can recover. We strongly encourage businesses to consult with experienced legal counsel before taking any action, including filing a breach of contract lawsuit.

At Scarinci Hollenbeck, our attorneys have decades of combined experience helping clients navigate breach of contract situations effectively. Our dedicated business attorneys work closely with clients to develop cost-effective legal strategies that achieve their goals, whether that means preserving a business relationship, filing a lawsuit to recover losses, or demanding specific performance.


Need guidance on a breach of contract issue? Contact us today to discuss your legal options and understand how long you have to sue for breach of contract in your specific situation.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!