Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm News
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 30, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBut is having a cyber insurance policy a wise choice to protect your company in the wake of a costly data breach? One danger is that the policy tries to limit its exposure by imposing requirements that may be practically impossible to administer.
As an example, in California, Columbia Casualty Co., a member of the CNA Group, is seeking to enforce an exclusion in its policy that requires its insured to meet “minimum required practices.”
The lawsuit stems from a data breach suffered by Cottage Health System, which involved approximately 32,500 confidential medical records. According to court documents, Cottage Health Systems and its third-party vendor failed to implement proper security measures, such as data encryption, to protect patient data that was accessible via the Internet. A resulting class-action lawsuit settled for $4.1 million, which Columbia Casualty agreed to fund subject to a complete reservation of rights.
In Columbia Casualty Company v. Cottage Health Systems, No. 2:15-cv-03432, the insurance company is now seeking reimbursement based on a policy exclusion stating:
“Any failure of an Insured to continuously implement the procedures and risk controls identified in the Insured’s application for this Insurance and all related information submitted to the Insurer in conjunction with such application whether orally or in writing…”
Columbia Casualty maintains that because the healthcare company failed to monitor and continuously update its cybersecurity protocols, insurance coverage should be excluded. It points to representations that Cottage Health Systems allegedly made in its application – notably that the company regularly evaluated its exposure to data security and privacy risks.
For businesses that hope to rely on cyber insurance in exactly this type of situation — where the company or another third party’s negligence inadvertently leads to a data breach — the suit is troublesome as it appears to eviscerate the very protection many companies are seeking.
In terms of case law, cyber insurance is still relatively new. As a result, there may be little existing case law interpreting the relevant exclusions. To assess your rights and obligations under a cyber insurance policy, it may be prudent to review the terms and consult with experienced counsel to try to anticipate significant coverage concerns.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Nine Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized in 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers in America® Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that nine of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America®. First published in 1983, Best Lawyers is universally regarded […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Environmental Law Scholarship Recipient Talha Iqbal! Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has awarded the second annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law to Talha Iqbal, a rising third-year student at Rutgers Law School in Newark. Mr. Iqbal will receive $2,500 to support his continued legal education. The Environmental Law Scholarship is awarded annually […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Two Partners, a Counsel, and a Senior Associate Deepen the Firm’s Litigation Bench in Little Falls, Red Bank, and New York City Following last month’s announcement that eight attorneys joined the firm, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC continues its expansion, this time strengthening its Litigation Group. The firm welcomes Paul S. Grossman and Jay R. McDaniel as […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Unanimous Controversies Committee ruling addresses the scope of an athletic association’s disciplinary authority and the procedural standards governing its exercise. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC announced today that Partner Robert E. Levy served as counsel to the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association (NJSIAA) in the proceedings that resulted in the revocation of the 2025 regional and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Partners Mark Tabakin, Donald Scarinci, and Don Pepe for Inclusion in NJBIZ’s 2026 Power 50 in Law List Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that Donald Scarinci, Founding & Managing Partner, Donald M. Pepe, Partner of the firm’s Commercial Real Estate Department, and Mark A. Tabakin, Partner in the firm’s Public […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has been named to the NJBIZ 2026 Best Places to Work in New Jersey, earning recognition in the Medium Companies category (50 to 249 employees). Now in its latest edition, the annual program honors New Jersey organizations that go beyond the paycheck to invest in their employees’ growth and quality of life. […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!