Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm News
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 25, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comLyndhurst, NJ, June 25, 2019 – Scarinci Hollenbeck successfully represented AASKI Technology, Inc. (AASKI) in a bid protest before the Government Accountability Office (GAO), preserving the company’s award to provide technological support services to the U.S. Army. United Support Services, LLC (USS) protested the award, challenging the agency’s evaluation of proposals. In a decision issued June 18, 2019, and made public on June 24, 2019, the GAO rejected the protest and upheld the award in favor of AASKI, allowing the company to begin work on the five-year, $576+ million U.S. Army contract.
On August 23, 2018, the U.S. Army issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for sensor technology, operations and readiness maintenance (STORM) in support of the Army’s product manager, medium altitude reconnaissance and surveillance systems (PdM MARSS) for current and emerging overseas contingency operations. These services are planned to support the overall mission of PdM MARSS of providing tactically relevant manned aerial intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance in support of current and emerging overseas contingency operations.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances
The RFP contemplated the issuance of a cost-plus-fixed-fee/cost-no-fee task order using a best-value tradeoff based on cost/price, and the following non-cost/price factors: technical, contractor support capabilities, and small business participation plan.
The Army received five proposals, including proposals from USS and AASKI. The Army rated four of the proposals, including USS’ proposal as unacceptable under the technical factor and eliminated the four proposals from consideration for the award.
With respect to USS, the Army assigned USS a deficiency, among other reasons, because it failed to explain how it would provide Airborne Sensor Operators (ASOs) for the AWAPPS and TACOP sensors.
AASKI, having submitted the only technically acceptable proposal, was awarded the contract. The Army concluded that AASKI’s proposed price was fair and reasonable and, moreover, represented the best value to the Government.
In response to the award, USS filed a protest, contending, among other things, that the Army unreasonably evaluated its proposal, treated USS and AASKI disparately in the evaluation, and improperly failed to hold discussions. With respect to discussions, USS maintained that given the magnitude of the procurement, and the fact that the Army received only one technically acceptable offer, it was unreasonable for the Army not to engage in discussions.
Following a briefing from USS, the Army, and AASKI, the GAO denied the protest. The GAO found reasonable the Army’s conclusion that USS’s proposal failed to explain how USS would provide ASOs for the AWAPPS and TACOP sensors reasonable. The GAO noted that USS’ “blanket statement in its proposal that it would provide an ASO for each sensor” did not salvage its proposal.
The GAO further rejected USS’ argument that the Army disparately evaluated proposals. The GAO found AASKI, like USS, explained how it proposed to leverage experienced teammates to provide qualified ASOs for all sensor systems. In comparison, the GAO noted that USS’s proposal “did not show that its teammate had current staff with experience with the EMARSS-G system, or the AWAPPS or TACOP sensors.”
Finally, the GAO rejected USS’ argument that the failure of the Army to engage in discussions was unreasonable here. The GAO explained that, although DFARS § 215.306 “provides that an agency should engage in discussions when the value of the acquisition equals or exceeds $100 million,” that provision was inapplicable here because the procurement was conducted under FAR part 16.
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Roshan D. Shah and Associate Kevin M. Foltmer represented AASKI in this matter.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for fourth consecutive year Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon has been named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for 2025. After four decades of practice, Nathanya’s pioneering influence in the field of special […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Congratulations Angela Turiano on appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton April 17, 2025 – Little Falls, NJ – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC congratulates Partner Angela Turiano on her appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton. Along with serving as a member of SHRM Princeton’s leadership team, Angela will monitor pending legislative, regulatory, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Congratulations Brittany P. Tarabour for Nomination as Three-Year Trustee of the Monmouth Bar Association Red Bank, NJ – April 9, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC proudly congratulates Brittany P. Tarabour on her nomination by the Monmouth Bar Association to serve as a Three-Year Trustee. Founded in 1908, the Monmouth Bar Association is dedicated to […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Ron Bienstock Featured on Bloomberg Law Podcast to Discuss Dua Lipa Copyright Infringement Lawsuits Little Falls, NJ – April 8, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC Partner and Chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property and Entertainment & Media departments Ronald S. Bienstock was recently featured on the Bloomberg Law podcast to discuss […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys From Little Falls and Red Bank Named to 2025 New Jersey Super Lawyers List Little Falls, NJ – April 2, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys from both NJ offices were named to the 2025 New Jersey Super Lawyers and Rising Stars list. Each attorney was chosen in recognition of their […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
On Thursday, April 3, 2025, Partner Angela Turiano will make her fifth appearance as a mock arbitrator for the Securities Arbitration Clinic at the prestigious Fordham School of Law. Angela will draw on her years of experience to provide feedback to these future lawyers after making opening presentations and closing arguments, with the goal of […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!