
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comClient Alert
Authors: Daniel T. McKillop, John M. Scagnelli
Date: December 16, 2025

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.com
On November 17, 2025, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) changed its previously proposed rule which would have required persons conducting All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI)(due diligence) at real properties to report any discharge of contamination discovered during the due diligence to NJDEP and the record owner of the property. NJDEP has now changed its proposed rule to require that discovered discharges of contamination be reported only to the record owners of the real property. NJDEP’s reproposed rule, however, introduces a new legal requirement for persons conducting due diligence at properties in New Jersey, and will significantly affect how real estate transactions and the management of environmental contamination at those properties are handled.
On October 21, 2024, NJDEP proposed a new due diligence discharge reporting rule, N.J.A.C. 7:26C-2.4, and a revision to an existing rule, N.J.A.C. 7:26C-1.7, which required persons conducting All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) (due diligence) at New Jersey real properties to report any discovered discharges of contamination on the properties to the NJDEP and the record owner of the property. The regulated community objected to this proposed due diligence discharge reporting rule as negatively affecting New Jersey real estate transactions and the management of environmental contamination and risks at real properties, including brownfields and contaminated sites.
Under the reproposed due diligence discharge reporting rule, if a person conducting due diligence discovers a discharge during the conduct of due diligence, that person must notify the record property owner of the discovered discharge. All persons conducting due diligence have this reporting obligation, including, without limitation, environmental consultants, New Jersey Licensed Site Remediation Professionals (LSRPs), and other persons. Once the record property owner is notified of the discharge, the record property owner has the legal responsibility to report the discovered discharge to NJDEP under the New Jersey Spill Act and to initiate remediation of the contamination at the real property.
NJDEP’s reproposed due diligence discharge reporting rule will require a substantial change to how environmental due diligence is conducted at New Jersey real properties. If adopted by NJDEP, persons involved in real estate transactions at New Jersey properties will need to reexamine how they conduct environmental due diligence and assess and allocate environmental risks of those properties. Sellers and Prospective Purchasers of real properties in New Jersey should consult knowledgeable legal counsel to determine how the reproposed NJDEP due diligence discharge reporting rule affects their particular situation.
Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental & Land Use attorneys have extensive experience advising clients on NJDEP regulatory compliance, ISRA and Spill Act obligations, site remediation and environmental risk management in complex real estate and industrial matters. Our team regularly counsels purchasers, sellers, lenders and responsible parties on diligence strategy and regulatory considerations that intersect with NJDEP oversight.
If you have questions regarding the re-proposed NJDEP due diligence reporting rule or need guidance on how these obligations may affect your operations or transactions, please contact our Environmental Group to discuss how we can assist.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) has quickly transformed from a niche policy idea into a nationwide regulatory framework that directly affects companies of every size. Rather than viewing waste management as purely a municipal function, state EPR laws shift financial and operational responsibility for the collection, recycling, and disposal of products and packaging materials onto the […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On January 12, Governor Murphy signed the “Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act” into law. The new statute is designed to reduce public exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS. These chemicals, often called “forever chemicals,” are used widely in consumer products for their water, oil, and grease resistance. They persist in the […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On January 20, 2026, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection adopted amendments to its land use regulatory program to address the risks posed by climate change to New Jersey residents, their property, and the natural environment. Called the Resilient Environments And Landscapes (“REAL”) Rules. Originally proposed in 2024, these regulations faced substantial opposition, prompting […]
Author: William Sullivan

On January 29, 2026, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 58 of 2026, adding a new chapter to the New York City Administrative Code that imposes statutory deadlines on cooperative boards when reviewing purchase applications that require board approval. The law addresses longstanding concerns about protracted and unpredictable co-op approval timelines and will […]
Author: Scott E. Koop

On January 5, 2026, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a published decision in In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 7:1C, rejecting consolidated challenges filed by industry and labor petitioners to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Environmental Justice Rules. The decision affirms NJDEP’s authority to implement New Jersey’s 2020 Environmental Justice […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On November 18, 2025, President Trump nominated M. Carter Crow, the Global Head of Labor and Employment at Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, to be General Counsel of the EEOC. Carter Crow focuses his practice on wage and hour litigation, contracts, and restrictive covenants. As of this writing, Carter Crow has yet to be voted out […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!