Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Client Alert

Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Date: August 3, 2026

Key Contacts

Back
Daniel McKillop, Scarinci Hollenbeck cannabis attorney, on the Senate proposal to delay federal hemp restrictions

Industry Faces Continued Uncertainty Ahead of the November 2026 Deadline

The U.S. Senate has introduced a funding measure that would temporarily delay implementation of sweeping federal hemp restrictions scheduled to take effect on November 12, 2026. While the proposal provides a potential short-term reprieve for hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and investors, it does not eliminate the underlying statutory changes enacted in late 2025. Unless Congress ultimately modifies or repeals those provisions, significant portions of the hemp-derived cannabinoid marketplace could face federal prohibition later this year.

Background: The 2025 Federal Redefinition of Hemp

The current controversy stems from legislation enacted as part of the federal appropriations process in November 2025. That legislation amended the federal definition of hemp established by the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the “2018 Farm Bill”), Pub. L. No. 115-334, codified principally at 7 U.S.C. § 1639o et seq.

Under the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp is generally defined as cannabis and cannabis derivatives containing no more than 0.3% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on a dry-weight basis. The 2018 Farm Bill’s specific limitation to delta-9 THC alone enabled the rapid growth of the non-delta-9 hemp-derived cannabinoid industry and the proliferation of products containing CBD and other hemp-derived cannabinoids, such as tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), delta-8 THC, delta-10 THC, or combinations of these compounds.

The 2025 legislation significantly narrowed that framework by shifting from a delta-9 THC measurement standard to a broader “total THC” standard and imposing additional restrictions on finished hemp-derived cannabinoid products. The law becomes effective on November 12, 2026, unless Congress intervenes.

What Would Change on November 12, 2026?

The amendments enacted in 2025 are widely viewed as a substantial tightening of federal hemp law. Among the most significant changes:

  • Hemp would be evaluated using a broader total THC methodology rather than a delta-9 THC-only standard.
  • Final hemp-derived cannabinoid products would be limited to 0.4 mg total THC per container.
  • Certain synthetic and intoxicating cannabinoids, i.e., cannabinoids that are not extracted directly from hemp in commercially significant quantities but instead are created through chemical conversion or synthetic manufacturing processes, would be prohibited or substantially restricted.

The combination of the new “total THC” methodology together with the 0.4 mg total THC per container limit (rather than per serving) would render the vast majority of currently marketed hemp-derived cannabinoid products illegal under federal law. Estimates cited by hemp trade organizations suggest that more than 90% of existing products may not satisfy the revised standards, jeopardizing the hemp-derived cannabinoid industry in America that is currently valued at approximately $28.4 billion annually and which supports more than 300,000 jobs nationwide.

Senate Proposal Would Push Deadline to December

On August 3, 2026, leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee released a continuing resolution and funding package that would postpone implementation of the 2025 hemp restrictions until December 11, 2026, rather than November 12, 2026. The stated objective is to provide Congress additional time to consider a longer-term legislative solution.

Importantly, the proposal does not repeal the underlying statutory amendments. Instead, it would provide a brief extension while lawmakers continue debating the future federal framework for hemp-derived cannabinoid products. Further, certain restrictions on synthetic cannabinoids may still take effect under the existing schedule.

Legislative Efforts to Modify the Hemp Restrictions

Several competing proposals have emerged in Congress since enactment of the 2025 law.

Some lawmakers have introduced measures that would delay implementation until 2028, while others have advocated outright repeal of the 2025 restrictions. Additional proposals would establish a federal regulatory framework specifically addressing hemp-derived cannabinoid products rather than broadly prohibiting them through statutory definitions. As of late July 2026, none of these proposals had advanced beyond committee consideration.

The Executive Branch has also expressed concern regarding the practical impact of the 2025 amendments, and federal officials have urged Congress to revise aspects of the legislation or extend implementation while a more comprehensive regulatory approach is evaluated.

Practical Implications for Hemp Businesses

The continuing resolution should not be viewed as a resolution of the industry’s regulatory challenges. Even if Congress adopts the Senate proposal, businesses would merely receive additional time before the revised federal standards take effect.

Because the proposal remains part of the appropriations process, businesses should closely monitor subsequent Senate action, House negotiations, and any final enacted appropriations legislation. Manufacturers, brand owners, distributors, and retailers should also continue evaluating:

  1. Product formulations and total THC content.
  2. Exposure to federal “total THC” requirements.
  3. Dependence on cannabinoids that may be characterized as synthetic or intoxicating.
  4. Inventory planning and supply chain commitments extending beyond November 2026.
  5. State-law compliance requirements that may continue to apply regardless of federal developments.

The Senate Appropriations Committee’s proposal must now be considered and passed by the Senate, approved by the House of Representatives, and signed by the President before it becomes law. If the House and Senate pass different versions, the hemp provisions will be subject to negotiation as part of the broader appropriations process. During those negotiations, Congress could retain the one-month delay, extend it further, modify the underlying hemp restrictions, or remove the delay entirely. Until a final appropriations measure is enacted, the current statutory effective date remains November 12, 2026, meaning hemp businesses should continue planning for compliance while closely monitoring developments.

Businesses operating in New Jersey should also continue monitoring state regulatory developments, as federal action does not automatically preempt all state restrictions governing hemp-derived cannabinoid products.

How Our Firm Can Help

The federal hemp industry remains at a critical inflection point. The Senate’s proposed continuing resolution would temporarily delay implementation of the 2025 federal hemp restrictions, but it would not eliminate them. Unless Congress ultimately modifies the law, businesses could still face significant federal compliance obligations beginning later this year. Accordingly, cannabinoid manufacturers, distributors, retailers, investors, and lenders should continue preparing for the possibility that the revised federal hemp definition and product restrictions will become effective in late 2026.

Daniel T. McKillop is a Partner and Chair of the Cannabis & Hemp Law practice group at Scarinci Hollenbeck, resident in the firm’s Little Falls, New Jersey office. He counsels manufacturers, brand owners, distributors, retailers, investors, and lenders on federal and New Jersey hemp and cannabis regulatory compliance, product classification, licensing, and enforcement matters.

If you have questions about how the proposed extension or the November 12, 2026 effective date may affect your business, please contact Mr. McKillop at 201-896-7115 or dmckillop@sh-law.com, or reach the firm’s Cannabis and Hemp Regulatory Group.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions post image

Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions

Industry Faces Continued Uncertainty Ahead of the November 2026 Deadline The U.S. Senate has introduced a funding measure that would temporarily delay implementation of sweeping federal hemp restrictions scheduled to take effect on November 12, 2026. While the proposal provides a potential short-term reprieve for hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and investors, it does not […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions"
New Jersey Data Center Bans Draw a Second Developer Lawsuit, and a $300 Million Damages Claim post image

New Jersey Data Center Bans Draw a Second Developer Lawsuit, and a $300 Million Damages Claim

New Jersey municipalities are moving aggressively to keep data centers out, and developers are beginning to push back in court. Within the span of a month, two New Jersey townships have been sued by data center developers over local bans, and one of those suits seeks damages in excess of $300 million. Property owners, developers, […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Data Center Bans Draw a Second Developer Lawsuit, and a $300 Million Damages Claim"
New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Data Broker Law That Could Affect More Businesses Than Expected post image

New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Data Broker Law That Could Affect More Businesses Than Expected

On June 30, 2026, Governor Mikie Sherrill signed Assembly Bill 5328 (P.L.2026, c.25), establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework governing data brokers and certain businesses that sell or license personal information. While the New Jersey data broker law has garnered attention for imposing annual registration fees that can reach $1.5 million, its significance extends well beyond […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Data Broker Law That Could Affect More Businesses Than Expected"
New Jersey Enacts 'Power NJ Act' as Gov. Sherrill Signs Advanced Nuclear Procurement Into Law post image

New Jersey Enacts 'Power NJ Act' as Gov. Sherrill Signs Advanced Nuclear Procurement Into Law

Following near-unanimous passage by both the Assembly and Senate, Governor Sherrill has signed the Power NJ Act (S4296/A4881) into law, formally establishing New Jersey’s first statutory pathway for procuring advanced nuclear energy facilities. As we reported when the Legislature passed the bill, the Power NJ Act directs the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Enacts 'Power NJ Act' as Gov. Sherrill Signs Advanced Nuclear Procurement Into Law"
New Jersey Legislature Passes “Power NJ Act” Clearing Path for Advanced Nuclear Energy Development post image

New Jersey Legislature Passes “Power NJ Act” Clearing Path for Advanced Nuclear Energy Development

On June 30, 2026, the New Jersey Assembly and Senate both approved the “Power NJ Act” (A4881), sending the legislation to Governor Sherrill for signature after unanimous, bipartisan approval. The Power NJ Act would direct the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, in partnership with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, to establish a program […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Legislature Passes “Power NJ Act” Clearing Path for Advanced Nuclear Energy Development"
NJ Supreme Court Confirms Personal Email Is Within OPRA's Reach: What Boards, Municipalities, Public Officials and Public Entities Must Do Now post image

NJ Supreme Court Confirms Personal Email Is Within OPRA's Reach: What Boards, Municipalities, Public Officials and Public Entities Must Do Now

If Your Public Officials Conduct Public Business on Personal Accounts, Those Communications May Be Subject to Disclosure under the New Jersey Open Public Records Act (N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq.). A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision has direct consequences for every board of education, municipality, and public agency in the state. In Rosetti v. Ramapo-Indian […]

Author: Seraphema Menna

Link to post with title - "NJ Supreme Court Confirms Personal Email Is Within OPRA's Reach: What Boards, Municipalities, Public Officials and Public Entities Must Do Now"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!