
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: August 3, 2026

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
The U.S. Senate has introduced a funding measure that would temporarily delay implementation of sweeping federal hemp restrictions scheduled to take effect on November 12, 2026. While the proposal provides a potential short-term reprieve for hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and investors, it does not eliminate the underlying statutory changes enacted in late 2025. Unless Congress ultimately modifies or repeals those provisions, significant portions of the hemp-derived cannabinoid marketplace could face federal prohibition later this year.
The current controversy stems from legislation enacted as part of the federal appropriations process in November 2025. That legislation amended the federal definition of hemp established by the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the “2018 Farm Bill”), Pub. L. No. 115-334, codified principally at 7 U.S.C. § 1639o et seq.
Under the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp is generally defined as cannabis and cannabis derivatives containing no more than 0.3% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on a dry-weight basis. The 2018 Farm Bill’s specific limitation to delta-9 THC alone enabled the rapid growth of the non-delta-9 hemp-derived cannabinoid industry and the proliferation of products containing CBD and other hemp-derived cannabinoids, such as tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), delta-8 THC, delta-10 THC, or combinations of these compounds.
The 2025 legislation significantly narrowed that framework by shifting from a delta-9 THC measurement standard to a broader “total THC” standard and imposing additional restrictions on finished hemp-derived cannabinoid products. The law becomes effective on November 12, 2026, unless Congress intervenes.
The amendments enacted in 2025 are widely viewed as a substantial tightening of federal hemp law. Among the most significant changes:
The combination of the new “total THC” methodology together with the 0.4 mg total THC per container limit (rather than per serving) would render the vast majority of currently marketed hemp-derived cannabinoid products illegal under federal law. Estimates cited by hemp trade organizations suggest that more than 90% of existing products may not satisfy the revised standards, jeopardizing the hemp-derived cannabinoid industry in America that is currently valued at approximately $28.4 billion annually and which supports more than 300,000 jobs nationwide.
On August 3, 2026, leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee released a continuing resolution and funding package that would postpone implementation of the 2025 hemp restrictions until December 11, 2026, rather than November 12, 2026. The stated objective is to provide Congress additional time to consider a longer-term legislative solution.
Importantly, the proposal does not repeal the underlying statutory amendments. Instead, it would provide a brief extension while lawmakers continue debating the future federal framework for hemp-derived cannabinoid products. Further, certain restrictions on synthetic cannabinoids may still take effect under the existing schedule.
Several competing proposals have emerged in Congress since enactment of the 2025 law.
Some lawmakers have introduced measures that would delay implementation until 2028, while others have advocated outright repeal of the 2025 restrictions. Additional proposals would establish a federal regulatory framework specifically addressing hemp-derived cannabinoid products rather than broadly prohibiting them through statutory definitions. As of late July 2026, none of these proposals had advanced beyond committee consideration.
The Executive Branch has also expressed concern regarding the practical impact of the 2025 amendments, and federal officials have urged Congress to revise aspects of the legislation or extend implementation while a more comprehensive regulatory approach is evaluated.
The continuing resolution should not be viewed as a resolution of the industry’s regulatory challenges. Even if Congress adopts the Senate proposal, businesses would merely receive additional time before the revised federal standards take effect.
Because the proposal remains part of the appropriations process, businesses should closely monitor subsequent Senate action, House negotiations, and any final enacted appropriations legislation. Manufacturers, brand owners, distributors, and retailers should also continue evaluating:
The Senate Appropriations Committee’s proposal must now be considered and passed by the Senate, approved by the House of Representatives, and signed by the President before it becomes law. If the House and Senate pass different versions, the hemp provisions will be subject to negotiation as part of the broader appropriations process. During those negotiations, Congress could retain the one-month delay, extend it further, modify the underlying hemp restrictions, or remove the delay entirely. Until a final appropriations measure is enacted, the current statutory effective date remains November 12, 2026, meaning hemp businesses should continue planning for compliance while closely monitoring developments.
Businesses operating in New Jersey should also continue monitoring state regulatory developments, as federal action does not automatically preempt all state restrictions governing hemp-derived cannabinoid products.
The federal hemp industry remains at a critical inflection point. The Senate’s proposed continuing resolution would temporarily delay implementation of the 2025 federal hemp restrictions, but it would not eliminate them. Unless Congress ultimately modifies the law, businesses could still face significant federal compliance obligations beginning later this year. Accordingly, cannabinoid manufacturers, distributors, retailers, investors, and lenders should continue preparing for the possibility that the revised federal hemp definition and product restrictions will become effective in late 2026.
Daniel T. McKillop is a Partner and Chair of the Cannabis & Hemp Law practice group at Scarinci Hollenbeck, resident in the firm’s Little Falls, New Jersey office. He counsels manufacturers, brand owners, distributors, retailers, investors, and lenders on federal and New Jersey hemp and cannabis regulatory compliance, product classification, licensing, and enforcement matters.
If you have questions about how the proposed extension or the November 12, 2026 effective date may affect your business, please contact Mr. McKillop at 201-896-7115 or dmckillop@sh-law.com, or reach the firm’s Cannabis and Hemp Regulatory Group.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Industry Faces Continued Uncertainty Ahead of the November 2026 Deadline The U.S. Senate has introduced a funding measure that would temporarily delay implementation of sweeping federal hemp restrictions scheduled to take effect on November 12, 2026. While the proposal provides a potential short-term reprieve for hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and investors, it does not […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

New Jersey municipalities are moving aggressively to keep data centers out, and developers are beginning to push back in court. Within the span of a month, two New Jersey townships have been sued by data center developers over local bans, and one of those suits seeks damages in excess of $300 million. Property owners, developers, […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On June 30, 2026, Governor Mikie Sherrill signed Assembly Bill 5328 (P.L.2026, c.25), establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework governing data brokers and certain businesses that sell or license personal information. While the New Jersey data broker law has garnered attention for imposing annual registration fees that can reach $1.5 million, its significance extends well beyond […]
Author: George McGowan

Following near-unanimous passage by both the Assembly and Senate, Governor Sherrill has signed the Power NJ Act (S4296/A4881) into law, formally establishing New Jersey’s first statutory pathway for procuring advanced nuclear energy facilities. As we reported when the Legislature passed the bill, the Power NJ Act directs the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On June 30, 2026, the New Jersey Assembly and Senate both approved the “Power NJ Act” (A4881), sending the legislation to Governor Sherrill for signature after unanimous, bipartisan approval. The Power NJ Act would direct the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, in partnership with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, to establish a program […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

If Your Public Officials Conduct Public Business on Personal Accounts, Those Communications May Be Subject to Disclosure under the New Jersey Open Public Records Act (N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq.). A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision has direct consequences for every board of education, municipality, and public agency in the state. In Rosetti v. Ramapo-Indian […]
Author: Seraphema Menna
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!