Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Will Uber Win the Battle of the Taxi or Succumb to Business Regulation?
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: July 23, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Uber records approximately one million ride requests each week and is now valued at an estimated $18.2 billion.
Despite its surging popularity with riders, the company continues to face strong resistance from regulators and traditional taxis over its novel business model, which uses a cell phone application to connect drivers using their personal vehicles with passengers who need a ride.
The debate largely centers on whether ride-sharing companies, which also include Lyft, Hailo, and Sidecar, should be required to follow the same rules as traditional taxis and car services. Ride-sharing companies maintain that they are simply technology companies that offer mobile applications connecting private drivers with passengers. Meanwhile, regulators and competitors argue that the tech companies essentially function as taxis and, therefore, should be subject to driver background checks, safety inspections, permitting, insurance minimums, and other legal requirements.
Some states and local governments have amended their regulations to allow for ride-sharing services. In New York City, Uber and other e-hail apps are authorized under a one-year pilot program, which was approved by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) in 2013. Lyft may also soon hit city streets under an agreement reached with city officials. However, other municipalities have taken a more hardline approach by prohibiting ride-sharing services through cease-and-desist letters and threatening to suspend the licenses of participating drivers.
In the wake of its ongoing legal battles, Uber seems willing to tweak its business model to appease its critics. In response to liability concerns, the company now provides $1 million in commercial liability insurance per accident. In New York City, one of the most lucrative taxi markets, the company recently entered into an agreement with Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to comply with the state’s price gouging law. It prohibits businesses from charging “unconscionably excessive prices” for essential consumer goods or services during “abnormal market disruptions,” such as national disasters and states of emergency.
In the end, the taxi battle may come down to consumer demand. A TLC survey found that 70 percent of riders in New York own smartphones, and more than half would like to use those devices to hail a cab.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss regulations impacting your business, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Will Uber Win the Battle of the Taxi or Succumb to Business Regulation?
Author: Dan Brecher
Uber records approximately one million ride requests each week and is now valued at an estimated $18.2 billion.
Despite its surging popularity with riders, the company continues to face strong resistance from regulators and traditional taxis over its novel business model, which uses a cell phone application to connect drivers using their personal vehicles with passengers who need a ride.
The debate largely centers on whether ride-sharing companies, which also include Lyft, Hailo, and Sidecar, should be required to follow the same rules as traditional taxis and car services. Ride-sharing companies maintain that they are simply technology companies that offer mobile applications connecting private drivers with passengers. Meanwhile, regulators and competitors argue that the tech companies essentially function as taxis and, therefore, should be subject to driver background checks, safety inspections, permitting, insurance minimums, and other legal requirements.
Some states and local governments have amended their regulations to allow for ride-sharing services. In New York City, Uber and other e-hail apps are authorized under a one-year pilot program, which was approved by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) in 2013. Lyft may also soon hit city streets under an agreement reached with city officials. However, other municipalities have taken a more hardline approach by prohibiting ride-sharing services through cease-and-desist letters and threatening to suspend the licenses of participating drivers.
In the wake of its ongoing legal battles, Uber seems willing to tweak its business model to appease its critics. In response to liability concerns, the company now provides $1 million in commercial liability insurance per accident. In New York City, one of the most lucrative taxi markets, the company recently entered into an agreement with Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to comply with the state’s price gouging law. It prohibits businesses from charging “unconscionably excessive prices” for essential consumer goods or services during “abnormal market disruptions,” such as national disasters and states of emergency.
In the end, the taxi battle may come down to consumer demand. A TLC survey found that 70 percent of riders in New York own smartphones, and more than half would like to use those devices to hail a cab.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss regulations impacting your business, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.