The diversity of a company’s board of directors continues to face increased scrutiny, with Nasdaq, Inc. proposing a new rule that would require companies listed on its exchange to have at least one woman and one underrepresented minority…
The diversity of a company’s board of directors continues to face increased scrutiny, with Nasdaq, Inc. proposing a new rule that would require companies listed on its exchange to have at least one woman and one underrepresented minority. The board diversity requirements must still be approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Increased Focus on Board Diversity
Diversity is becoming a more frequent topic of discussion when it comes to selecting board members, with shareholders calling on boards to include more women and racial minorities. While federal regulators have not yet established requirements regarding board diversity, states are beginning to take action. In California, boards must have at least one female member. Starting on January 1, 2021, companies based in Illinois must disclose the race and genders of their directors.
While significant strides have been made to increase board diversity in recent years, progress has been slow and significant disparity still exists. According to a Harvard Law School study, 66 percent of board members at Fortune 500 companies were white men in 2018. Another 17.9 percent were white women, followed by 11.5 percent men of color and 4.6 percent women of color. When it comes to executive leadership, as of May 2019, 6.6% percent of Fortune 500 CEOs are women, and there are similarly low numbers of people of color leading those companies.
Many companies have voluntarily established policies seeking to increase diversity and/or disclose their board makeup. According to studies, these efforts often pay off, with increased diversity shown to boost a company’s performance. For instance, a Mckinsey & Co study found that ethnically diverse companies are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above national industry medians and gender diverse companies are 15 percent more likely to do the same.
Nasdaq’s Board Diversity Rule Proposal
If approved by the SEC, Nasdaq’s new listing rules would require all companies listed on Nasdaq’s U.S. exchange to publicly disclose consistent, transparent diversity statistics regarding their board of directors. Additionally, the rules would require most Nasdaq-listed companies to have, or explain why they do not have, at least two diverse directors, including one who self-identifies as female and one who self-identifies as either an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+. Foreign companies and smaller reporting companies would have additional flexibility in satisfying this requirement with two female directors. Under the proposed listing rules, an “underrepresented minority” is defined as an individual who self-identifies in one or more of the following groups: Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander or two or more races or ethnicities.
According to Nasdaq, the changes are intended to provide stakeholders with a better understanding of the company’s current board composition and enhance investor confidence that all listed companies are considering diversity in the context of selecting directors. “Diversity of experience, gender, race, knowledge, and perspective means that a company is more capable of seeing the full picture, assessing risk and overcoming challenges with forward-looking, innovative solutions,” Michael Splinter, Chairman of Nasdaq, said in a press statement.
The rule proposal would specifically require Nasdaq-listed companies to publicly disclose board-level diversity statistics through Nasdaq’s proposed disclosure framework within one year of the SEC’s approval of the listing rule. The deadline for meeting the minimum board composition expectations would be determined by the company’s listing tier. All companies would be expected to have one diverse director within two years of the SEC’s approval of the listing rule. Companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and Nasdaq Global Market would have an additional two year (four total) to comply. Companies listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market would be expected to have two diverse directors within five years of the SEC’s approval.
Notably, companies that are unable to meet the board composition objectives within the required timeframes would not be subject to delisting provided that they provide a public explanation of their reasons for not meeting the objectives.
Goldman Sachs Board Diversity Policy
Startups hoping to go public may also have to consider diversity if they plan to use Goldman Sachs as their underwriter. Effective July 1, the bank will only underwrite IPOs in the US and Europe of private companies that have at least one diverse board member. Starting in 2021, Goldman Sachs will increase the target to two diverse candidates.
Goldman Sachs is the largest underwriter of initial public offerings (IPOs) in the United States. In support of the policy change, Goldman Sachs emphasized that companies with diverse leadership perform better. In a statement about the new policy, CEO David Solomon stated that “[i]n addition to the real commercial benefits, it’s clear that changing the stereotypes associated with corporate decision-making will have many positive effects for society as a whole.”
While Solomon acknowledged that board diversity has increased in recent years, he contended that progress has been too slow. In the last two years, more than 60 companies went public in the US and Europe without a diverse board member, according to the company.
Key Takeaway
Board diversity is an issue that companies of all sizes should take seriously. When selecting new board members or considering a board diversity policy, it is imperative to address business and legal considerations. Given that this is a quickly evolving area of law, we also encourage businesses to stay on top of any new regulatory requirements.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Howard Bader, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Will Public Companies Soon be Required to Increase Board Diversity?
Author: Howard D. Bader
The diversity of a company’s board of directors continues to face increased scrutiny, with Nasdaq, Inc. proposing a new rule that would require companies listed on its exchange to have at least one woman and one underrepresented minority…
The diversity of a company’s board of directors continues to face increased scrutiny, with Nasdaq, Inc. proposing a new rule that would require companies listed on its exchange to have at least one woman and one underrepresented minority. The board diversity requirements must still be approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Increased Focus on Board Diversity
Diversity is becoming a more frequent topic of discussion when it comes to selecting board members, with shareholders calling on boards to include more women and racial minorities. While federal regulators have not yet established requirements regarding board diversity, states are beginning to take action. In California, boards must have at least one female member. Starting on January 1, 2021, companies based in Illinois must disclose the race and genders of their directors.
While significant strides have been made to increase board diversity in recent years, progress has been slow and significant disparity still exists. According to a Harvard Law School study, 66 percent of board members at Fortune 500 companies were white men in 2018. Another 17.9 percent were white women, followed by 11.5 percent men of color and 4.6 percent women of color. When it comes to executive leadership, as of May 2019, 6.6% percent of Fortune 500 CEOs are women, and there are similarly low numbers of people of color leading those companies.
Many companies have voluntarily established policies seeking to increase diversity and/or disclose their board makeup. According to studies, these efforts often pay off, with increased diversity shown to boost a company’s performance. For instance, a Mckinsey & Co study found that ethnically diverse companies are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above national industry medians and gender diverse companies are 15 percent more likely to do the same.
Nasdaq’s Board Diversity Rule Proposal
If approved by the SEC, Nasdaq’s new listing rules would require all companies listed on Nasdaq’s U.S. exchange to publicly disclose consistent, transparent diversity statistics regarding their board of directors. Additionally, the rules would require most Nasdaq-listed companies to have, or explain why they do not have, at least two diverse directors, including one who self-identifies as female and one who self-identifies as either an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+. Foreign companies and smaller reporting companies would have additional flexibility in satisfying this requirement with two female directors. Under the proposed listing rules, an “underrepresented minority” is defined as an individual who self-identifies in one or more of the following groups: Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander or two or more races or ethnicities.
According to Nasdaq, the changes are intended to provide stakeholders with a better understanding of the company’s current board composition and enhance investor confidence that all listed companies are considering diversity in the context of selecting directors. “Diversity of experience, gender, race, knowledge, and perspective means that a company is more capable of seeing the full picture, assessing risk and overcoming challenges with forward-looking, innovative solutions,” Michael Splinter, Chairman of Nasdaq, said in a press statement.
The rule proposal would specifically require Nasdaq-listed companies to publicly disclose board-level diversity statistics through Nasdaq’s proposed disclosure framework within one year of the SEC’s approval of the listing rule. The deadline for meeting the minimum board composition expectations would be determined by the company’s listing tier. All companies would be expected to have one diverse director within two years of the SEC’s approval of the listing rule. Companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and Nasdaq Global Market would have an additional two year (four total) to comply. Companies listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market would be expected to have two diverse directors within five years of the SEC’s approval.
Notably, companies that are unable to meet the board composition objectives within the required timeframes would not be subject to delisting provided that they provide a public explanation of their reasons for not meeting the objectives.
Goldman Sachs Board Diversity Policy
Startups hoping to go public may also have to consider diversity if they plan to use Goldman Sachs as their underwriter. Effective July 1, the bank will only underwrite IPOs in the US and Europe of private companies that have at least one diverse board member. Starting in 2021, Goldman Sachs will increase the target to two diverse candidates.
Goldman Sachs is the largest underwriter of initial public offerings (IPOs) in the United States. In support of the policy change, Goldman Sachs emphasized that companies with diverse leadership perform better. In a statement about the new policy, CEO David Solomon stated that “[i]n addition to the real commercial benefits, it’s clear that changing the stereotypes associated with corporate decision-making will have many positive effects for society as a whole.”
While Solomon acknowledged that board diversity has increased in recent years, he contended that progress has been too slow. In the last two years, more than 60 companies went public in the US and Europe without a diverse board member, according to the company.
Key Takeaway
Board diversity is an issue that companies of all sizes should take seriously. When selecting new board members or considering a board diversity policy, it is imperative to address business and legal considerations. Given that this is a quickly evolving area of law, we also encourage businesses to stay on top of any new regulatory requirements.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Howard Bader, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
