
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comSenate Judiciary Committee Chairman Nicholas Scutari (D-Union) has introduced Senate Bill 1896 for consideration by the New Jersey Senate. The proposed legislation would legalize possession, cultivation and the sale of small amounts of marijuana. He believes that it is time for New Jersey to stop prosecuting and start regulating and taxing minor marijuana use. However, the bill has a long road ahead, especially in light of the governor’s promises to veto it.
Scutari is the municipal prosecutor for the city of Linden. He reports that the fight to eradicate marijuana use has been wholly unsuccessful, yet billions of dollars have been spent on enforcement measures. He also indicated that it is unreasonable for citizens having criminal records resulting from minor marijuana offenses to be unable to buy a home or obtain employment.
If it is successful, the proposed bill would permit adults 21 years of age and over to possess an ounce or less of marijuana. It would also allow them to cultivate up to six marijuana plants for personal use (and not for sale) in an enclosed, locked space.
The sale of marijuana would be regulated in a way similar to the manner in which the state regulates liquor sales. The proposal also provides that local governments could be permitted to ban the sale of marijuana within their borders.
If the sale of marijuana is allowed, it would be subject to state sales tax, resulting in millions of dollars of the tax revenue per year for New Jersey. Scutari’s bill would dedicate 70% of those tax revenues to the Transportation Trust Fund, 20% to drug education and enforcement programs and the remainder to women’s health programs.
Governor Chris Christie has repeatedly promised to veto any bill proposing to legalize marijuana, so only time will tell how the issue will be decided in New Jersey.
If you have any questions about this proposed bill or would like to discuss any issues your business is facing, please contact me, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!