By way of example, according to the American Apparel & Footwear Association, 97 percent of apparel and 98 percent of footwear sold in the United States are manufactured overseas. However, consumer demand for American-made clothing and shoes has grown in recent years.
Consumer demand for American-made products has grown in recent years.
Additionally, the demand for U.S. made high-end goods such, as guitars, basses and boutique music instrument amplifiers has increased as well. For businesses that do make their goods in this country, being able to use a “Made in USA” label can be a very successful marketing tool. However, it is imperative to play by the rules.
What does “Made in USA” mean?
Under Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidance, “Made in USA” means that “all or virtually all” the product has been made in America. Moreover, all significant parts, processing, and labor that go into the product must be of U.S. origin. Products may not contain any — or only negligible — foreign content.
In applying the “all or virtually all” standard, the FTC will analyze a number of different factors…
In applying the “all or virtually all” standard, the FTC will analyze a number of different factors, including the proportion of the product’s total manufacturing costs attributable to U.S. parts and processing, how far removed any foreign content is from the finished product, and the importance of the foreign content or processing to the overall function of the product.
What if you can’t meet the “Made in USA” standard?
For businesses that can’t satisfy the standard, it is possible to include a qualified “Made in USA” claim, which describes the extent, amount or type of a product’s domestic content or processing and indicates that the product isn’t entirely of domestic origin. Examples include: “70% U.S. content,” or “Made in USA of U.S. and imported parts or assembled in the USA using domestic and foreign parts.”
Be mindful when you claim “Made in USA”
In any event, it is imperative for businesses to thoroughly analyze the percentage of domestic content in a particular product before making a “Made in USA” claim. Under the FTC Act, the FTC is authorized to bring law enforcement actions against false or misleading claims, including those that misstate a product is of U.S. origin.In 2015, the FTC staff sent 28 “closing letters” to businesses that were investigated by the agency and subsequently agreed to alter their labeling and advertising to comply with federal law. To date, the FTC has sent 18 letters in 2016, which suggests the agency’s radar screen is quite active.
If you are unsure whether you can claim “Made in USA” or if you would like to discuss the matter further, contact me, Ron Bienstock, at 201-806-3364.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
