Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 18, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe 2014 hurricane season has been kind to New Jersey so far. However, some New Jersey Businesses are still feeling the repercussions of their conduct in the wake of Superstorm Sandy. So far, the state has recovered a total of $1,080,702.64 in civil penalties, consumer restitution, and other fees from entities accused of having violated the New Jersey price gouging statute.
Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-109, businesses are prohibited from imposing excessive price increases during a declared state of emergency for merchandise used as a direct result of an emergency or used to “protect the life, health, safety, or comfort of persons or their property.” The law defines excessive price increases as more than 10 percent above the price at which merchandise was sold during the normal course of business immediately prior to the state of emergency.
New Jersey businesses may raise prices in cases where their supplier imposes higher costs or the merchants otherwise incur additional costs of providing goods or services during the state of emergency. Even then, however, the markup above cost may not exceed 10 percent above the markup from cost applied in the usual course of business prior to the state of emergency. Businesses face fines up to $10,000 for a first violation and up to $20,000 for subsequent violations. Notably, each sale of merchandise is considered a separate event.
In the wake of Superstorm Sandy, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office has cracked down on businesses, particularly hotels and gas stations, that violated the State’s price gouging statute. According to a press statement by the Division of Consumer Affairs, it has filed 27 enforcement actions, of which 23 have been resolved through settlement.
Most recently, Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman announced a settlement with Amy Hotels, LLC, d/b/a “Econo Lodge,” in Egg Harbor Township. The hotel has agreed to pay $64,543.96 to resolve allegations that it engaged in 545 instances of unlawful price gouging, which purportedly included raising room rates from $79.00 to $199.99 per night during the state of emergency. An additional $25,000 in civil penalties is suspended but will become payable if the hotel fails to abide by the terms of the settlement within one year.
Early September marks the height of the Atlantic hurricane season, so we may not yet be out of the woods. Should disaster strike, we remind local businesses that trying to capitalize on others’ misfortune may not only harm your reputation, but also your bottom line.
If you have any questions about New Jersey’s price gouging statute or would like to discuss how a disaster may impact your business, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!