Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 18, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe 2014 hurricane season has been kind to New Jersey so far. However, some New Jersey Businesses are still feeling the repercussions of their conduct in the wake of Superstorm Sandy. So far, the state has recovered a total of $1,080,702.64 in civil penalties, consumer restitution, and other fees from entities accused of having violated the New Jersey price gouging statute.
Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-109, businesses are prohibited from imposing excessive price increases during a declared state of emergency for merchandise used as a direct result of an emergency or used to “protect the life, health, safety, or comfort of persons or their property.” The law defines excessive price increases as more than 10 percent above the price at which merchandise was sold during the normal course of business immediately prior to the state of emergency.
New Jersey businesses may raise prices in cases where their supplier imposes higher costs or the merchants otherwise incur additional costs of providing goods or services during the state of emergency. Even then, however, the markup above cost may not exceed 10 percent above the markup from cost applied in the usual course of business prior to the state of emergency. Businesses face fines up to $10,000 for a first violation and up to $20,000 for subsequent violations. Notably, each sale of merchandise is considered a separate event.
In the wake of Superstorm Sandy, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office has cracked down on businesses, particularly hotels and gas stations, that violated the State’s price gouging statute. According to a press statement by the Division of Consumer Affairs, it has filed 27 enforcement actions, of which 23 have been resolved through settlement.
Most recently, Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman announced a settlement with Amy Hotels, LLC, d/b/a “Econo Lodge,” in Egg Harbor Township. The hotel has agreed to pay $64,543.96 to resolve allegations that it engaged in 545 instances of unlawful price gouging, which purportedly included raising room rates from $79.00 to $199.99 per night during the state of emergency. An additional $25,000 in civil penalties is suspended but will become payable if the hotel fails to abide by the terms of the settlement within one year.
Early September marks the height of the Atlantic hurricane season, so we may not yet be out of the woods. Should disaster strike, we remind local businesses that trying to capitalize on others’ misfortune may not only harm your reputation, but also your bottom line.
If you have any questions about New Jersey’s price gouging statute or would like to discuss how a disaster may impact your business, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!