James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Use With Care: Foreign Taxpayers And Transparent U.S. Limited Liability Companies
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: October 29, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
Mr. Anson & the HMRC
Much ado has been made about the use of hybrid entities that are viewed as flow-through (transparent) or disregarded in one jurisdiction but are separate taxpayers or non-transparent in the other jurisdiction.
A United Kingdom (U.K.) resident (Anson) ran his United States (U.S.) consulting business through a Delaware limited liability company. Mr. Anson was personally responsible for and paid income taxes on his U.S. earnings. The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) sought to impose tax on the remittance to the U.K. and denied Mr. Anson a credit for tax paid to the U.S.
HMRC denial
HMRC denied the credit on the grounds that the remittance was not the same as the income from business profits recognized in the U.S. The HMRC position was that business income is different than remittance which is akin to a dividend. The HMRC position is based upon its view that a limited liability company is a corporation, thus a separate person. Perhaps, this position is overstated as each limited liability company (LLC) is evaluated on facts and circumstances. The income reported in the U.S. was taxed to an individual who is taxed in the U.S. on the profits earned by a transparent entity. The view of HMRC was that the entity did not earn the income and individual members of U.S. LLCs are taxed on profits when earned and not when distributed. Fortunately for Mr. Anson, the U.K. Supreme Court held that he was entitled to the tax credit.
One can anticipate other cases if the U.K. revenue authorities continue to adhere to this position. Under the U.S. – U.K. income tax treaty, royalties paid to a U.K. resident corporation from the U.S. are exempt from withholding if a U.K. corporation does not have a permanent establishment in the U.S. Suppose the U.K. corporation interposes a U.S. limited liability company between itself and the payer. If one extends the position taken in Anson, the royalty would not qualify because the LLC is not a resident of the U.K. and it is not the payer of the royalty. Disputes might arise in other areas, such as withholding on interest, dividends, branch profits as well as the exemption for international transportation.
It is particularly important to note that a tax treaty does not always harmonized the treatment of hybrid entities.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Use With Care: Foreign Taxpayers And Transparent U.S. Limited Liability Companies
Author: James F. McDonough
Mr. Anson & the HMRC
Much ado has been made about the use of hybrid entities that are viewed as flow-through (transparent) or disregarded in one jurisdiction but are separate taxpayers or non-transparent in the other jurisdiction.
A United Kingdom (U.K.) resident (Anson) ran his United States (U.S.) consulting business through a Delaware limited liability company. Mr. Anson was personally responsible for and paid income taxes on his U.S. earnings. The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) sought to impose tax on the remittance to the U.K. and denied Mr. Anson a credit for tax paid to the U.S.
HMRC denial
HMRC denied the credit on the grounds that the remittance was not the same as the income from business profits recognized in the U.S. The HMRC position was that business income is different than remittance which is akin to a dividend. The HMRC position is based upon its view that a limited liability company is a corporation, thus a separate person. Perhaps, this position is overstated as each limited liability company (LLC) is evaluated on facts and circumstances. The income reported in the U.S. was taxed to an individual who is taxed in the U.S. on the profits earned by a transparent entity. The view of HMRC was that the entity did not earn the income and individual members of U.S. LLCs are taxed on profits when earned and not when distributed. Fortunately for Mr. Anson, the U.K. Supreme Court held that he was entitled to the tax credit.
One can anticipate other cases if the U.K. revenue authorities continue to adhere to this position. Under the U.S. – U.K. income tax treaty, royalties paid to a U.K. resident corporation from the U.S. are exempt from withholding if a U.K. corporation does not have a permanent establishment in the U.S. Suppose the U.K. corporation interposes a U.S. limited liability company between itself and the payer. If one extends the position taken in Anson, the royalty would not qualify because the LLC is not a resident of the U.K. and it is not the payer of the royalty. Disputes might arise in other areas, such as withholding on interest, dividends, branch profits as well as the exemption for international transportation.
It is particularly important to note that a tax treaty does not always harmonized the treatment of hybrid entities.