Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 20, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTwitter recently forged a unique agreement with San Francisco, whereby the company would keep its headquarters in the city in exchange for lucrative payroll tax breaks. Currently, San Francisco is the only city in California that collects payroll taxes, according to the San Francisco Gate. An analysis conducted by certified public accountant Jim McHale – in collaboration with the Chronicle – revealed that San Francisco stands to lose roughly $34 million in revenue from stock grants alone that may be exercised and sold after the company’s IPO.
Currently, the rising stock indicates that this scenario may become a reality, an ABC News report found.
“About 82 million shares of Twitter have exchanged hands already,” the news source noted. “To put that in perspective, Twitter only sold 70 million shares in its IPO. One way to think about it, every share issued in Twitter’s IPO has been traded more than once, and the session isn’t half over yet.”
Additionally, the city noted that that payroll tax law agreement struck with Twitter may cost them about $22 million over a six-year period without the IPO – or $56 million overall – leaving many analysts to wonder how revenue streams will be affected over the next several years.
Despite the potential losses, the San Francisco claims that it would have forfeited more revenue in the long run if the company had decided to relocate its headquarters to Palo Alto, Calif. Although the city stands to gain from keeping the company in its cross hairs, not all are on board with the deal.
“As technology companies like Twitter and Facebook seek to turn ideas into profits by going public and selling stock, they are also exploiting taxpayer subsidies for executive pay to avoid paying any taxes on billions of dollars of earnings,” Think Progress columnist Alan Pyke wrote.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!