
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert A. Marsico
Date: December 2, 2014

Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comThe Federal Reserve Bank of New York is facing growing criticism over its Wall Street oversight. Critics, including several high-ranking members of Congress, contend that it is too cozy with the entities it is charged with regulating. One of the top concerns is the so-called revolving door through which employees move to and from the big banks and its chief regulator. The New York Fed’s president, William C. Dudley, formerly worked as Goldman Sach’s chief economist.
While Dudley has taken a tougher approach to Wall Street supervision during his tenure, critics of the New York Fed question whether he is doing enough to reform the regulator’s culture and keep the big banks in check.
“More than six years ago, when regulators got too cozy with the banks they were regulating, we saw the cost in lost jobs, retirement savings and homes,” Senator Sherrod Brown stated in advance of a recent hearing of the Senate Banking Committee’s subcommittee for financial institutions. “It’s past time that the Federal Reserve shows — with actions, not words — that it will protect consumers rather than Wall Street.”
In the latest scandal, an employee with the Federal Reserve leaked confidential documents to his former colleague, who had left the regulator after seven years to work as a banker for Goldman Sachs. While both employees have reportedly been fired, the breach highlights the potential for serious conflicts of interest.
Earlier this fall, reports surfaced that the New York Fed gave Goldman preferential treatment when examining a deal that was described as “legal, but shady.” Audio recordings secretly captured by a former New York Fed examiner, Carmen M. Segarra, supported the reports.
The recent Senate hearing also focused on whether the New York Fed should have been more proactive in passing information to law enforcement officials about potential criminal activity. Lawmakers specifically cited a case in which Credit Suisse employees helped clients avoid U.S. taxes through secret offshore accounts, which scheme was uncovered through an investigation by the Senate rather than by financial regulators.
In response to the criticism, the Federal Reserve Board recently announced plans to evaluate the strength of its current oversight. The actions include a request that the inspector general examine whether bank supervision information was properly shared throughout the agency and whether an arrangement existed to ensure that the opinions of all its examiners are given sufficient weight. However, it is unclear if these efforts will appease critics.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!