Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 27, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIndependent movie theaters may be losing opportunities at the hands of big theater chains, all because of deals known as clearance agreements.
The Department of Justice has begun an investigation into several theater chains in the U.S., and at the heart of the DOJ’s probe are clearance agreements. These are exclusive deals between theaters and distributors that have been around for some time, but may be squeezing small, independent theaters out of business. The concept of clearance agreements is at the center of an antitrust lawsuit against American Multi-Cinema, following claims from Viva Cinemas Theaters that AMC’s exclusivity deals put the Spanish-language theater out of business and is harming the Houston area’s Hispanic population, according to the Hollywood Reporter. However, the Houston theater’s case against AMC is just one example of a practice that could be hurting similar businesses nationwide.
Exclusivity deals themselves are not illegal, Entertainment Weekly explained. However, the way that big chains are using clearance agreements could be disrupting competitive balance and fairness in the marketplace. When a nationwide theater company asks for exclusivity or threatens not to show a film if a smaller competitor is allowed to exhibit it, it could be in breach of antitrust laws.
Smaller theaters have expressed the opinion that these exclusivity deals give national chains too much power, and limit consumer choice. A rise in theater construction has coincided with an increase in clearance requests, according to the Wall Street Journal. The increasing prevalence of these exclusivity deals has escalated attention given to these agreements and whether or not they violate existing antitrust laws.
If you own or work for a small theater that appears to be suffering due to exclusivity granted to larger chains in the area, consult an experienced entertainment attorney for more on the case against these companies and their clearances.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!