Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 22, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhen it comes to dividing up an estate among heirs, many affluent individuals and business owners balk at leaving one child more assets, cash, or property than their other children for fear that it will cause sibling rivalry. However, when business interests or family heirlooms are involved, this may be the best policy.
Changes to the estate tax law allow individuals to leave $5.25 million – or $10.5 million for married couples filing jointly – to heirs in 2013, up from $5.12 million in 2012. The gift tax exclusion also increased to $14,000 for singles and $28,000 for couples, compared to 2012 limits of $13,000 and $26,000, respectively. As business owners may now transfer larger portions of their estates to heirs without triggering a tax, it’s important to make objective, rather than emotional, decisions regarding wealth transfers, according to recent article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Many business owners hand down family assets in an effort to further their legacy and continue to build wealth for future generations. Splitting up assets evenly among several children can lead to family squabbles about how to manage assets, a scenario that could eventually diminish wealth. In addition, those who have different ideas about how to run the company or simply want no stake in it at all could sell their shares or make other decisions that impact a company’s future.
For these reasons, business owners are advised to take the competency and future goals of each heir into consideration before handing over a sizable portion of the estate. If one member is better suited to handle day-to-day operations than another, splitting assets evenly may not be a smart move. In addition, working with an estate attorney to create trusts designed to keep assets within the family is another move that may prevent heirs from selling off or jeopardizing a company’s future.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!