Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Understanding stadium funding
Stadium funding has become a controversial topic, especially among taxpayers, due to the burden is often placed on them and their preference that someone else foot the considerable bills.
Private vs. public: Paying for a stadium
Professional teams’ facilities are expensive, both through construction and afterward. Funding can essentially be split into two categories: private and public. Whom the bigger burden falls on often depends on the location of the stadium. In recent years, however, there have been pushes to ease the financial stress that public funding can have on taxpayers. These individuals generally would be pleased to keep their beloved football, baseball, hockey or basketball organizations in their hometowns, but the cost of doing so may be too much and they are left to wonder, “Why are we paying for this?”
The Obama administration’s 2016 budget includes a provision which aims to ease the burden on taxpayers by eliminating the use of tax-exempt bonds to finance professional sports facilities. These bonds are typically paid back by cities and states over the course of several years through a series of levies. Purchasing investors, meanwhile, don’t pay taxes on their income, making these tax-exempt bonds a more affordable way to get sports facilities built. However, they have also led to taxpayers covering large chunks of stadium funding costs.
Who funded stadiums built in the last 18 years?
A Conventions, Sports & Leisure International study broke down NFL stadium funding from 1997 to 2015. For example, it noted that the $1.6 billion total cost of MetLife Stadium was covered completely by private funding. However, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ Raymond James Stadium, built in 1998, was publicly funded, with a price tag of $194 million, with the money coming from a 0.5 percent county sales tax increase, tourist revenue, a state sales tax revenue bond and investment income.
Seven of the eight stadiums built from 1997 through 2001 were mostly covered by the public, ranging from 100 percent for the Buccaneers’ facility to 61 percent for the Pittsburg Steelers’ Heinz Field, built in 2001. Meanwhile, only half of the stadiums built from 2002 through 2015 were built using majority public funding, and none were 100 percent covered by taxpayers. Since the start of 2002, the largest percentage the public paid to cover an NFL stadium was 81 percent, for the Indianapolis Colts’ Lucas Oil Stadium. This facility was covered by a 3 percent Marion county hotel tax increase, a 2 percent county car rental tax increase, 1 percent increases to admissions tax and restaurant taxes in Marion county and six surrounding counties and Colts license plate sales.
However, year-to-year, who funds sports facilities seems to be more random, possibly due to local regulations and regional preferences. If tax-exempt bonds are actually eliminated from sports facilities funding budgets, the burden will likely shift more to private investors.
If you want to learn more about who is funding stadium construction or renovation in your state or city, speak with an experienced for information.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Stadium Funding: How It's Done
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Understanding stadium funding
Stadium funding has become a controversial topic, especially among taxpayers, due to the burden is often placed on them and their preference that someone else foot the considerable bills.
Private vs. public: Paying for a stadium
Professional teams’ facilities are expensive, both through construction and afterward. Funding can essentially be split into two categories: private and public. Whom the bigger burden falls on often depends on the location of the stadium. In recent years, however, there have been pushes to ease the financial stress that public funding can have on taxpayers. These individuals generally would be pleased to keep their beloved football, baseball, hockey or basketball organizations in their hometowns, but the cost of doing so may be too much and they are left to wonder, “Why are we paying for this?”
The Obama administration’s 2016 budget includes a provision which aims to ease the burden on taxpayers by eliminating the use of tax-exempt bonds to finance professional sports facilities. These bonds are typically paid back by cities and states over the course of several years through a series of levies. Purchasing investors, meanwhile, don’t pay taxes on their income, making these tax-exempt bonds a more affordable way to get sports facilities built. However, they have also led to taxpayers covering large chunks of stadium funding costs.
Who funded stadiums built in the last 18 years?
A Conventions, Sports & Leisure International study broke down NFL stadium funding from 1997 to 2015. For example, it noted that the $1.6 billion total cost of MetLife Stadium was covered completely by private funding. However, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ Raymond James Stadium, built in 1998, was publicly funded, with a price tag of $194 million, with the money coming from a 0.5 percent county sales tax increase, tourist revenue, a state sales tax revenue bond and investment income.
Seven of the eight stadiums built from 1997 through 2001 were mostly covered by the public, ranging from 100 percent for the Buccaneers’ facility to 61 percent for the Pittsburg Steelers’ Heinz Field, built in 2001. Meanwhile, only half of the stadiums built from 2002 through 2015 were built using majority public funding, and none were 100 percent covered by taxpayers. Since the start of 2002, the largest percentage the public paid to cover an NFL stadium was 81 percent, for the Indianapolis Colts’ Lucas Oil Stadium. This facility was covered by a 3 percent Marion county hotel tax increase, a 2 percent county car rental tax increase, 1 percent increases to admissions tax and restaurant taxes in Marion county and six surrounding counties and Colts license plate sales.
However, year-to-year, who funds sports facilities seems to be more random, possibly due to local regulations and regional preferences. If tax-exempt bonds are actually eliminated from sports facilities funding budgets, the burden will likely shift more to private investors.
If you want to learn more about who is funding stadium construction or renovation in your state or city, speak with an experienced for information.