Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 1, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn 2012, Planetary Resources, Inc. announced that it planned to mine near-Earth asteroids for precious metals such as iron and platinum. The company attracted several high-profile funders, including Google Inc.’s Larry Page and director James Cameron. Several other companies have announced similar initiatives.
Although commercial space resource exploration is still in its infancy (no one has actually landed a manned spacecraft on an asteroid), lawmakers on Capitol Hill are currently considering legislation that would protect the property rights of U.S. companies that mine asteroid resources in outer space. The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 (H.R.1508), which is part of the larger SPACE Act (H.R. 2262).
“Asteroids are excellent potential sources of highly valuable resources and minerals. Space technology has advanced to the point that the private sector is now able to begin exploring and developing resources in space. Americans are willing to invest in asteroid mining, but they need legal certainty that they can keep the fruits of their labor.”
Under the proposed bill, resources mined from an asteroid would be the property of the entity that obtained them. The legislation specifically states that “[a]ny asteroid resources obtained in outer space are the property of the entity that obtained such resources, which shall be entitled to all property rights thereto, consistent with applicable provisions of Federal law and existing international obligations.”
The proposed space law also contains provisions intended to ensure that U.S. companies can legally conduct their operations without harmful interference.
Under the legislation, U.S. commercial space resource companies or foreign companies that voluntarily submit to the law statutory framework must “avoid causing harmful interference in outer space.” The Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 also authorizes operators to bring civil suits against “another entity subject to United States jurisdiction causing harmful interference to its operations with respect to an asteroid resource utilization activity in outer space.”
In addition, the legislation directs the White House to facilitate commercial development of asteroid resources. It mandates that the President “promote the right of United States commercial entities to explore outer space and utilize space resources, in accordance with the existing international obligations of the United States, free from harmful interference, and to transfer or sell such resources.”
As noted by the Wall Street Journal, the proposed commercial space exploration legislation is groundbreaking and controversial, with some critics questioning whether such unilateral action is even legal under existing space law treaties. Pursuant to the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, “[t]he exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind.” The treaty further states that “[o]uter space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.”
Accordingly, companion legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate by Sens. Patty Murray and Marco Rubio will likely generate additional study and debate. Stay tuned for updates.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!