Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

What You Need to Consider When Selling Company Stock

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: August 29, 2016

Key Contacts

Back

Filing Requirements When Selling Company Stock

In many cases, start-ups and other small businesses are selling company stock without registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or state regulatory authority. However, the key question is whether the offering qualifies for one of several exemptions from registration under the federal Securities Act of 1933 or state laws regulating the offering and sale of securities (often referred to as blue sky laws).

selling company stock

By way of example, you generally don’t need to file with securities regulators when forming your corporation and selling stock to yourself as well as co-founding shareholders. You also may not need to file with regulators when raising some initial capital from friends and family. However, it is imperative to thoroughly analyze what exemptions, if any, may apply to your particular stock sale, issuance or grant. Companies should also be mindful that federal and state laws do differ, so registration may be required by one regulator and not the other.

Rule 701 Exemption

Start-ups commonly take advantage of Rule 701 under the Securities Act when making equity awards to key members of the company. Rule 701 exempts certain compensatory equity awards issued to directors, officers, employees, trustees, service providers, etc. The key requirement is that the stock must be awarded pursuant to a written compensatory benefit plan or compensation contract. Accordingly, it may not be used for capital-raising transactions. Notably, Rule 701 is available to consultants and advisors, provided that they are natural persons who provide bona fide services to the issuer.

 Regulation D Exemption

selling company stock

Start-ups also frequently rely on Rule 506(b) of Regulation D when awarding stock to directors and executive of officers. Regulation D is a “safe harbor,” meaning that if you comply with the rule you are considered to have engaged in an offering that is exempt from registration. Even if you fail to comply with Regulation D, that doesn’t mean that your corporation has conducted a public offering of securities that should have been registered. The issuance of shares to a founder, or even several founders, is almost always considered to be a transaction “by an issuer not involving any public offering,” which is an exempt securities offering under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Accordingly, registration under the ’33 Act is not required for such sales. You don’t lose the 4(a)(2) exemption just because you did not file the Form D.

Restrictions on Reselling Shares

Don’t take exemptions as a license to then look for investors by offering the company stock or the stock that you received to others through the internet, a newspaper advertisement or other media without first registering that further offering. The important thing to keep in mind is that the ’33 Securities Act registers offerings and the ’34 Securities Exchange Act registers shares. It is a common occurrence today that an offering of shares that is exempt from registration under the ’33 Act does not mean that the offering, or the resale of those shares (which constitutes a different offering), is also exempt.

Failure to Register Securities

Securities transactions that are not exempt from registration and are not registered with the SEC violate Section 5 of the Securities Act. Violations may result in injunctive or other enforcement proceedings brought by the SEC, as well as private suits by securities purchasers seeking damages or rescission. In addition to costly SEC penalties, the company may also be required to make a rescission offer for all securities subject to the illegal transaction.

Registration and exemption issues are important to consider before making any offer to sell or commitment to issue company securities, therefore, if you are unsure how to approach the matter or have any questions, please contact me, Dan Brecher.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners post image

BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners"
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!