
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: August 29, 2016

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comIn many cases, start-ups and other small businesses are selling company stock without registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or state regulatory authority. However, the key question is whether the offering qualifies for one of several exemptions from registration under the federal Securities Act of 1933 or state laws regulating the offering and sale of securities (often referred to as blue sky laws).

By way of example, you generally don’t need to file with securities regulators when forming your corporation and selling stock to yourself as well as co-founding shareholders. You also may not need to file with regulators when raising some initial capital from friends and family. However, it is imperative to thoroughly analyze what exemptions, if any, may apply to your particular stock sale, issuance or grant. Companies should also be mindful that federal and state laws do differ, so registration may be required by one regulator and not the other.
Start-ups commonly take advantage of Rule 701 under the Securities Act when making equity awards to key members of the company. Rule 701 exempts certain compensatory equity awards issued to directors, officers, employees, trustees, service providers, etc. The key requirement is that the stock must be awarded pursuant to a written compensatory benefit plan or compensation contract. Accordingly, it may not be used for capital-raising transactions. Notably, Rule 701 is available to consultants and advisors, provided that they are natural persons who provide bona fide services to the issuer.

Start-ups also frequently rely on Rule 506(b) of Regulation D when awarding stock to directors and executive of officers. Regulation D is a “safe harbor,” meaning that if you comply with the rule you are considered to have engaged in an offering that is exempt from registration. Even if you fail to comply with Regulation D, that doesn’t mean that your corporation has conducted a public offering of securities that should have been registered. The issuance of shares to a founder, or even several founders, is almost always considered to be a transaction “by an issuer not involving any public offering,” which is an exempt securities offering under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Accordingly, registration under the ’33 Act is not required for such sales. You don’t lose the 4(a)(2) exemption just because you did not file the Form D.
Don’t take exemptions as a license to then look for investors by offering the company stock or the stock that you received to others through the internet, a newspaper advertisement or other media without first registering that further offering. The important thing to keep in mind is that the ’33 Securities Act registers offerings and the ’34 Securities Exchange Act registers shares. It is a common occurrence today that an offering of shares that is exempt from registration under the ’33 Act does not mean that the offering, or the resale of those shares (which constitutes a different offering), is also exempt.
Securities transactions that are not exempt from registration and are not registered with the SEC violate Section 5 of the Securities Act. Violations may result in injunctive or other enforcement proceedings brought by the SEC, as well as private suits by securities purchasers seeking damages or rescission. In addition to costly SEC penalties, the company may also be required to make a rescission offer for all securities subject to the illegal transaction.
Registration and exemption issues are important to consider before making any offer to sell or commitment to issue company securities, therefore, if you are unsure how to approach the matter or have any questions, please contact me, Dan Brecher.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!