
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comSellers often do not carefully consider how the indemnification provisions in a purchase agreement may impact them after the sale of their business. To avoid this and other traps, it is imperative to have an experienced business lawyer (not just your broker) review the purchase and sale contract before you sign.

Negotiating the sale of a business can be a long and arduous process. Once approaching the finish line, many business owners are eager to sign on the dotted line. While the eagerness is understandable, failing to fully appreciate your ongoing legal obligations can come back to bite you.
Other than the provisions involving the business purchase price and payment terms, indemnification provisions are among the most important. From the seller’s perspective, the indemnification provisions should be drawn as narrowly as possible so as to avoid significant legal liability after the closing.
In basic terms, an indemnification provision shifts the liability for identified post-sale costs or losses from the buyer to the seller. In most cases, the losses covered by the indemnification provision must be related in some to way to representations, warranties, or other seller obligations established in the purchase agreement. In other cases, the buyer may require the seller to indemnify specific losses, such as those related to environmental contamination, tax obligations, or outstanding legal claims.
Because indemnification is closely related to the seller’s representations and warranties, it is imperative to review these contract provisions very carefully. Whenever possible, sellers should seek to address potential liabilities prior to putting the business up for sale, which can limit the representations and warranties a buyer may require.
Because violations of the seller’s representations and warranties can trigger indemnification, the disclosure of any adverse material facts should also be thoroughly documented during the negotiation process and acknowledged in writing by the buyer. Doing so helps address the threat of a buyer suing the seller for breach of warranties and representations when the adverse facts result in business costs or losses after the sale closes. For instance, the seller may disclose that a certain employee has raised an internal sexual harassment complaint. Unless the seller has agreed to indemnify the buyer for the claim, the buyer can’t hold the seller accountable if the worker later files a lawsuit.
As highlighted in a prior post, sellers can also limit their post-sale liability for minor losses and set a cap on their indemnification obligation. A “basket” sets a monetary threshold that must be exceeded for indemnification to kick in. Meanwhile, a “cap” limits the total amount of money that must be paid under the indemnification provision in the event of a breach.
Sellers should also try to limit the “survival period” for bringing claims for breach of the contract representations and warranties. Under New Jersey’s statute of limitations for breaches of contract, an aggrieved party typically has six years to bring a claim. However, sellers can often negotiate a much shorter survival period of 12-18 months in the purchase and sale agreement.
As highlighted above, there are several opportunities for sellers to limit their post-sale liability. When negotiating indemnification provisions, it is imperative to have a skilled negotiator in your corner.
Are you currently in the process of selling a business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!