
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comSellers often do not carefully consider how the indemnification provisions in a purchase agreement may impact them after the sale of their business. To avoid this and other traps, it is imperative to have an experienced business lawyer (not just your broker) review the purchase and sale contract before you sign.

Negotiating the sale of a business can be a long and arduous process. Once approaching the finish line, many business owners are eager to sign on the dotted line. While the eagerness is understandable, failing to fully appreciate your ongoing legal obligations can come back to bite you.
Other than the provisions involving the business purchase price and payment terms, indemnification provisions are among the most important. From the seller’s perspective, the indemnification provisions should be drawn as narrowly as possible so as to avoid significant legal liability after the closing.
In basic terms, an indemnification provision shifts the liability for identified post-sale costs or losses from the buyer to the seller. In most cases, the losses covered by the indemnification provision must be related in some to way to representations, warranties, or other seller obligations established in the purchase agreement. In other cases, the buyer may require the seller to indemnify specific losses, such as those related to environmental contamination, tax obligations, or outstanding legal claims.
Because indemnification is closely related to the seller’s representations and warranties, it is imperative to review these contract provisions very carefully. Whenever possible, sellers should seek to address potential liabilities prior to putting the business up for sale, which can limit the representations and warranties a buyer may require.
Because violations of the seller’s representations and warranties can trigger indemnification, the disclosure of any adverse material facts should also be thoroughly documented during the negotiation process and acknowledged in writing by the buyer. Doing so helps address the threat of a buyer suing the seller for breach of warranties and representations when the adverse facts result in business costs or losses after the sale closes. For instance, the seller may disclose that a certain employee has raised an internal sexual harassment complaint. Unless the seller has agreed to indemnify the buyer for the claim, the buyer can’t hold the seller accountable if the worker later files a lawsuit.
As highlighted in a prior post, sellers can also limit their post-sale liability for minor losses and set a cap on their indemnification obligation. A “basket” sets a monetary threshold that must be exceeded for indemnification to kick in. Meanwhile, a “cap” limits the total amount of money that must be paid under the indemnification provision in the event of a breach.
Sellers should also try to limit the “survival period” for bringing claims for breach of the contract representations and warranties. Under New Jersey’s statute of limitations for breaches of contract, an aggrieved party typically has six years to bring a claim. However, sellers can often negotiate a much shorter survival period of 12-18 months in the purchase and sale agreement.
As highlighted above, there are several opportunities for sellers to limit their post-sale liability. When negotiating indemnification provisions, it is imperative to have a skilled negotiator in your corner.
Are you currently in the process of selling a business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!