Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

SEC Adopts New Standards for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: June 20, 2019

Key Contacts

Back

The Securities and Exchange Commission Recently Adopted New Standards for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted new standards for broker-dealers and investment advisers. The centerpiece of the new rule is Regulation Best Interest, which enhances the quality and transparency of investors’ relationships with investment advisers (IAs) and broker-dealers (BDs) while preserving access to various types of advice relationships and investment products. The SEC adopted new Form CRS Relationship Summary, and two separate interpretations under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

SEC Adopts New Standards for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers

Rationale Behind SEC’s New Regulations

The SEC adopted this package of new standards to enhance and clarify conduct standards applicable to BDs and IAs.  Investors will better understand and compare the services offered and make an informed choice of the relationship best suited to their needs and circumstances.  The new standards will foster greater consistency in the level of protections provided by each regime, particularly at the point in time that a recommendation is made to an investor.

“The rules and interpretations we are adopting today address issues that the Commission has been actively considering for nearly two decades,” said SEC Chairman Jay Clayton.  “Our staff, working collaboratively across all of our Divisions and many of our Offices, has leveraged its decades of experience and expertise in considering these issues.  I believe that the exceptional work of the SEC staff, including their careful evaluation of the feedback we received, will benefit retail investors and our markets for years to come.  This rulemaking package will bring the legal requirements and mandated disclosures for broker-dealers and investment advisers in line with reasonable investor expectations, while simultaneously preserving retail investors’ access to a range of products and services at a reasonable cost.”

Regulation Best Interest

Under Regulation Best Interest, a BD making a recommendation of a securities transaction, or an investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer, would have a duty to act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time the recommendation is made, without putting the financial or other interests of the broker-dealer ahead of the retail customer. A BD would discharge this duty by complying with four specific obligations:

  • Disclosure: mandatory disclosure of material facts about the relationship and recommendation, including specific disclosures about the capacity in which the broker is acting, fees, the type and scope of services provided, conflicts, limitations on services and products, and whether the firm provides monitoring services for the recommended investment. 
  • Care: must exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill when making a recommendation to a retail customer.  The BD must understand the potential risks, rewards, and costs associated with the recommendation.  The BD must then consider these factors in light of the retail customer’s investment profile and make a recommendation that is in the retail customer’s best interest.  The final regulation, which is an enhancement from the proposal, explicitly requires the BD to consider the costs of the recommendation.
  • Conflict of Interest: must establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to identify, and at a minimum disclose or eliminate, conflicts of interest.  This obligation, which is an enhancement from the proposal, specifically requires policies and procedures to:
    • Mitigate conflicts that create an incentive for the firm’s financial professionals to place their interest or the interests of the firm ahead of the retail customer’s interest;
    • Prevent material limitations on offerings, such as a limited product menu or offering only proprietary products, from causing the firm or its financial professionals to place his or her interest or the interests of the firm ahead of the retail customer’s interest; and
    • Eliminate sales contests, sales quotas, bonuses, and non-cash compensation that are based on the sale of specific securities or specific types of securities within a limited period of time.
  • Compliance: In an enhancement from the proposal, BDs must establish, maintain and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with Regulation Best Interest as a whole.

Form CRS

Investment advisers and broker-dealers will be required to provide retail investors a with form summarizing their relationship. This standardized, short-form, known as Form CRS (Customer/Client Relationship Summary), informs retail investors about: (i) the types of client and customer relationships and services the firm offers; (ii) the fees, costs, conflicts of interest, and required standard of conduct associated with those relationships and services; (iii) whether the firm and its financial professionals currently have reportable legal or disciplinary history; and (iv) how to obtain additional information about the firm.

Form CRS will reference a page on the SEC’s investor education website, Investor.gov, which offers educational information to investors about investment advisers, broker-dealers, and individual financial professionals and other materials. Retail investors will receive a relationship summary at the beginning of a relationship with a firm, communications of updated information following a material change to the relationship summary, and an updated relationship summary upon certain events. Notably, Form CRS is subject to SEC filing and recordkeeping requirements.

Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers:  Two Interpretations:

The SEC also published two separate interpretations under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The first sets forth the agency’s interpretation of the “federal fiduciary standard” applicable to investment advisers under Section 206(1) and (2) of the Advisers Act, and reaffirms that registered investment advisers owe a fiduciary duty to their clients, including duties of loyalty and care. 

The second interpretation involves the “solely incidental” prong of the BD exclusion under the Advisers Act. It excludes from the definition of investment adviser—and thus from the application of the Advisers Act—a broker or dealer whose performance of advisory services is solely incidental to the conduct of his/her business as a broker or dealer and who receives no special compensation for those services. 

The SEC’s new interpretation expressly states that a broker-dealer’s advice as to the value and characteristics of securities, or as to the advisability of transacting in securities, falls within the “solely incidental” prong of this exclusion if the advice is provided in connection with and is reasonably related to the broker-dealer’s primary business of effecting securities transactions.

What’s Next?  Publication, June 30, 2020 Effective Date, SEC Standards of Conduct Implementation Committee.

Regulation Best Interest, Form CRS and the SEC’s new interpretations will become effective 60 days after they are published in the Federal Register.

A one-year implementation period is provided.  By June 30, 2020, registered BDs must begin complying with Regulation Best Interest and BDs and IAs registered with the SEC will be required to prepare, deliver to retail investors, and file Form CRS.

The SEC is also establishing an inter-Divisional Standards of Conduct Implementation Committee to address implementation concerns.  Given the operational changes necessitated by the new rules, we encourage BDs and IAs to contact the author or one of our experienced regulatory attorneys with any questions or concerns. 

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Paul Lieberman, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
What to Do If You Are Impacted by a Retailer Bankruptcy Part 2 post image

What to Do If You Are Impacted by a Retailer Bankruptcy Part 2

Over the past year, brick-and-mortar stores have closed their doors at a record pace. Fluctuating consumer preferences, the rise of online shopping platforms, and ongoing economic uncertainty continue to put pressure on the retail industry. When a retailer seeks bankruptcy protection, a myriad of other businesses are often impacted. Whether you are a supplier, customer, […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "What to Do If You Are Impacted by a Retailer Bankruptcy Part 2"
The Current Administration's Proposals for the Financial Services and Banking Industries Will Affect Your Business post image

The Current Administration's Proposals for the Financial Services and Banking Industries Will Affect Your Business

Since his inauguration two months ago, Donald Trump’s administration and the Congress it controls have indicated important upcoming policy changes. These changes will impact financial services policies and priorities. The changes will particularly affect cryptocurrency, as well as banking rules and regulations. Key Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency For example, in the burgeoning cryptocurrency business environment, […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Current Administration's Proposals for the Financial Services and Banking Industries Will Affect Your Business"
Tips for Commercial Landlords Impacted by Wave of Retailer Bankruptcies Part 1 post image

Tips for Commercial Landlords Impacted by Wave of Retailer Bankruptcies Part 1

The retail sector has experienced a wave of bankruptcy filings over the last year. Brick-and-mortar businesses in financial distress include big-name brands like Big Lots, Party City, The Container Store, and Vitamin Shoppe. When large retailers seek bankruptcy protection, they are not the only businesses impacted. Landlords can be particularly hard hit. While commercial landlords […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "Tips for Commercial Landlords Impacted by Wave of Retailer Bankruptcies Part 1"
How Understanding Bankruptcy Trends Can Benefit Your Business post image

How Understanding Bankruptcy Trends Can Benefit Your Business

The bankruptcy legal landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses navigating financial distress. Understanding current bankruptcy trends can help businesses make more informed and strategic decisions. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Trending Upwards Bankruptcy filings continued to trend upwards in 2024. According to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, personal and business […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "How Understanding Bankruptcy Trends Can Benefit Your Business"
SEC Takes Actions Against Issuers for Failure to File Form D post image

SEC Takes Actions Against Issuers for Failure to File Form D

In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences. […]

Author: Kenneth C. Oh

Link to post with title - "SEC Takes Actions Against Issuers for Failure to File Form D"
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda post image

Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda

On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!

Please select a category(s) below: