Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
The Democrat appointees to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by a 3-2 majority vote, recently finalized the SEC’s controversial pay ratio rule.
Mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act, the new disclosures will require companies to reveal how their chief executive officers’ compensation compares to their workforce at large.
The SEC pay ratio rule attracted more than 280,000 public comments. Supporters of the new rule maintain that it will discourage reckless compensation packages and help foster economic equality; meanwhile, critics argue that the rule’s recordkeeping obligations are unnecessary and will unduly burden businesses. “To say that the views on the pay ratio disclosure requirement are divided is an obvious understatement,” SEC Mary Jo White stated in advance of the vote, in which the Republican appointees cast the negative votes.
The final rule
The final rule specifically amends existing executive compensation disclosure rules to require companies to disclose: the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees (excluding the CEO); the annual total compensation of its CEO; and the ratio of the two amounts. In response to public comments, the final rule gives businesses some leeway in reporting their CEO pay ratios. However, it does not provide as much flexibility as business groups had requested.
Companies will have some input into how they make the calculations. For instance, the final rule authorizes the use of statistical sampling to define the compensation of an entity’s median employees. Businesses will also be allowed to exclude up to five percent of their non-U.S. employees from their calculations.
Companies would only be required to provide the new information in filings that must already include executive compensation information under Item 402 of Regulation S-K, such as registration statements, proxy and information statements, and annual reports. The SEC’s new corporate disclosure requirements would not apply to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies, and foreign private issuers.
Companies must begin submitting disclosures in the first fiscal year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2017. After the initial disclosure, updates are generally required every three years.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know
For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law
As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions
In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What?
Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: George McGowan
Why Every Business Should Conduct an Annual Insurance Coverage Review
Most New Jersey business owners purchase insurance policies, file them away, and assume they are protected if a claim arises. Without a regular insurance coverage review, many companies discover gaps only after a lawsuit, cyberattack, property loss, or other significant event occurs. An annual insurance coverage review can help businesses identify potential risks, ensure their […]
Author: George McGowan
Demand Letters & Cease and Desist Letters: When to Send One (and When Not To)
Businesses and individuals often encounter situations where another party breaches a contract, fails to pay a debt, or continues harmful conduct. In many such disputes, a precisely drafted demand letter or cease-and-desist letter serves as a powerful legal tool. It can frequently resolve the dispute and avoid litigation. While demand or cease-and-desist letters can resolve […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.