Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
The Democrat appointees to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by a 3-2 majority vote, recently finalized the SEC’s controversial pay ratio rule.
Mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act, the new disclosures will require companies to reveal how their chief executive officers’ compensation compares to their workforce at large.
The SEC pay ratio rule attracted more than 280,000 public comments. Supporters of the new rule maintain that it will discourage reckless compensation packages and help foster economic equality; meanwhile, critics argue that the rule’s recordkeeping obligations are unnecessary and will unduly burden businesses. “To say that the views on the pay ratio disclosure requirement are divided is an obvious understatement,” SEC Mary Jo White stated in advance of the vote, in which the Republican appointees cast the negative votes.
The final rule
The final rule specifically amends existing executive compensation disclosure rules to require companies to disclose: the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees (excluding the CEO); the annual total compensation of its CEO; and the ratio of the two amounts. In response to public comments, the final rule gives businesses some leeway in reporting their CEO pay ratios. However, it does not provide as much flexibility as business groups had requested.
Companies will have some input into how they make the calculations. For instance, the final rule authorizes the use of statistical sampling to define the compensation of an entity’s median employees. Businesses will also be allowed to exclude up to five percent of their non-U.S. employees from their calculations.
Companies would only be required to provide the new information in filings that must already include executive compensation information under Item 402 of Regulation S-K, such as registration statements, proxy and information statements, and annual reports. The SEC’s new corporate disclosure requirements would not apply to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies, and foreign private issuers.
Companies must begin submitting disclosures in the first fiscal year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2017. After the initial disclosure, updates are generally required every three years.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.