Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 15, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York City recently became the latest to prohibit employers from asking job applicants for their salary history during the job interview or salary negotiation process.

Last year, Massachusetts became the first state in the country to ban employers and recruiters from asking job candidates about their wage history. Other states and municipalities have quickly followed suit. Last month, the New York City Council passed a regulation making it an unlawful discriminatory employment practice to inquire about the salary history of a job applicant, or rely on an applicant’s salary history when setting compensation during the hiring process.
New York State is currently considering similar legislation. Assembly Bill 5982 would make it an unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency to seek salary history from a prospective employee for an interview or as a condition of employment. The bill is currently in committee.
A New Jersey bill would amend the Law Against Discrimination (LAD) to include similar prohibitions. Under Assembly Bill No. 3480, employers would be prohibited from inquiring about the salary history of a job applicant, including the prospective candidate’s compensation and benefits.
On the federal level, lawmakers recently reintroduced the Paycheck Fairness Act. It would prohibit employers from screening job applicants based on their salary history or requiring salary history during the interview and hiring process. It would also require employers to prove that pay disparities exist for legitimate, job-related reasons and protect against retaliation for discussing salaries with colleagues.
The rationale behind the bans is that an unfair wage can continue to haunt workers when it is used to set the salary for a new position. In practice, women and minorities are often impacted most by pay discrimination. Accordingly, the restriction on asking about salary history is intended to improve pay equality by forcing employers to determine compensation based solely on merit.
Critics of wage history bans contend that the laws don’t actually help close the gender pay gap, but are merely window dressing that will more pointedly make hiring harder. They further maintain that companies are already taking steps to address pay equality and that additional wage laws only create regulatory burdens.
The Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce recently filed a lawsuit challenging the city’s salary history ban. It argues that the law violates employers’ First Amendment rights. “The ordinance is a broad impediment to businesses seeking to grow their workforce in the city of Philadelphia,” the chamber said in a statement.
For businesses that operate in several jurisdictions, it is important to stay on top of legal developments in this area. According to the National Women’s Law Center, 20 states, the District of Columbia, and two cities have introduced legislation that seeks to restrict inquiries into salary history information.
If your company is already subject to wage inquiry regulations, it is imperative to verify that all human resources personnel and hiring managers understand the new restrictions. Employers should also verify that any job applications do not request applicants to provide their salary history.
Do you have any questions regarding the salary history ban and how it may affect your New York business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!