Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 15, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York City recently became the latest to prohibit employers from asking job applicants for their salary history during the job interview or salary negotiation process.

Last year, Massachusetts became the first state in the country to ban employers and recruiters from asking job candidates about their wage history. Other states and municipalities have quickly followed suit. Last month, the New York City Council passed a regulation making it an unlawful discriminatory employment practice to inquire about the salary history of a job applicant, or rely on an applicant’s salary history when setting compensation during the hiring process.
New York State is currently considering similar legislation. Assembly Bill 5982 would make it an unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency to seek salary history from a prospective employee for an interview or as a condition of employment. The bill is currently in committee.
A New Jersey bill would amend the Law Against Discrimination (LAD) to include similar prohibitions. Under Assembly Bill No. 3480, employers would be prohibited from inquiring about the salary history of a job applicant, including the prospective candidate’s compensation and benefits.
On the federal level, lawmakers recently reintroduced the Paycheck Fairness Act. It would prohibit employers from screening job applicants based on their salary history or requiring salary history during the interview and hiring process. It would also require employers to prove that pay disparities exist for legitimate, job-related reasons and protect against retaliation for discussing salaries with colleagues.
The rationale behind the bans is that an unfair wage can continue to haunt workers when it is used to set the salary for a new position. In practice, women and minorities are often impacted most by pay discrimination. Accordingly, the restriction on asking about salary history is intended to improve pay equality by forcing employers to determine compensation based solely on merit.
Critics of wage history bans contend that the laws don’t actually help close the gender pay gap, but are merely window dressing that will more pointedly make hiring harder. They further maintain that companies are already taking steps to address pay equality and that additional wage laws only create regulatory burdens.
The Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce recently filed a lawsuit challenging the city’s salary history ban. It argues that the law violates employers’ First Amendment rights. “The ordinance is a broad impediment to businesses seeking to grow their workforce in the city of Philadelphia,” the chamber said in a statement.
For businesses that operate in several jurisdictions, it is important to stay on top of legal developments in this area. According to the National Women’s Law Center, 20 states, the District of Columbia, and two cities have introduced legislation that seeks to restrict inquiries into salary history information.
If your company is already subject to wage inquiry regulations, it is imperative to verify that all human resources personnel and hiring managers understand the new restrictions. Employers should also verify that any job applications do not request applicants to provide their salary history.
Do you have any questions regarding the salary history ban and how it may affect your New York business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!