Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
SAC Capital Advisors Settles Insider Trading Charges in Record Settlement
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 8, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Department of Justice recently announced a landmark settlement involving SAC Capital Advisors. The firm, which was once the world’s most powerful and successful players in the hedge fund industry, has agreed to pay nearly $1.8 billion in penalties to resolve allegations of insider trading.
According to a press release from U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, the company agreed to plead guilty to all of the criminal counts and will cease its investment adviser operations. While SAC cannot accept any additional funds from outside investors, it will be permitted to continue to manage the funds of its founder, Steven A. Cohen.
“The government believes that the proposed global resolution is fair, reasonable, and firmly promotes the interests of justice, deterrence and respect for the law. The aggregate $1.8 billion is – to the Government’s knowledge – the largest financial penalty in history for insider trading offenses,” prosecutors stated in court documents.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also stepped up enforcement of insider trading. SAC Capital previously agreed to pay $616 million to settle a parallel civil action, which will now be deducted from the $1.8 billion total in fines and forfeiture.
While SAC Capital can now put the insider trading scandal in the rear view, Cohen still a number of legal headaches. The settlement does not prohibit the government from continuing its criminal and civil investigations into Cohen’s role in the trading schemes. The agreement expressly states that it “provides no immunity from prosecution to any individual.”
Given the intense scrutiny on insider trading by both the DOJ and the SEC, firms should ensure that they have comprehensive policies and procedures in place to monitor trading compliance. While corporations don’t serve jail time, criminal penalties for compliance oversights can be extremely costly.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Blockchain, Cryptocurrency Defense & Investigations, Corporate Transactions & Business, Financial Services & Regulatory Practice
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.