Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
SAC Capital Advisors Settles Insider Trading Charges in Record Settlement
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 8, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Department of Justice recently announced a landmark settlement involving SAC Capital Advisors. The firm, which was once the world’s most powerful and successful players in the hedge fund industry, has agreed to pay nearly $1.8 billion in penalties to resolve allegations of insider trading.
According to a press release from U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, the company agreed to plead guilty to all of the criminal counts and will cease its investment adviser operations. While SAC cannot accept any additional funds from outside investors, it will be permitted to continue to manage the funds of its founder, Steven A. Cohen.
“The government believes that the proposed global resolution is fair, reasonable, and firmly promotes the interests of justice, deterrence and respect for the law. The aggregate $1.8 billion is – to the Government’s knowledge – the largest financial penalty in history for insider trading offenses,” prosecutors stated in court documents.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also stepped up enforcement of insider trading. SAC Capital previously agreed to pay $616 million to settle a parallel civil action, which will now be deducted from the $1.8 billion total in fines and forfeiture.
While SAC Capital can now put the insider trading scandal in the rear view, Cohen still a number of legal headaches. The settlement does not prohibit the government from continuing its criminal and civil investigations into Cohen’s role in the trading schemes. The agreement expressly states that it “provides no immunity from prosecution to any individual.”
Given the intense scrutiny on insider trading by both the DOJ and the SEC, firms should ensure that they have comprehensive policies and procedures in place to monitor trading compliance. While corporations don’t serve jail time, criminal penalties for compliance oversights can be extremely costly.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Blockchain, Cryptocurrency Defense & Investigations, Corporate Transactions & Business, Financial Services & Regulatory Practice
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.