
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: May 3, 2024
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comA resolution currently being debated in the New Jersey Legislature would allow voters to determine whether environmental rights should be enshrined in the State Constitution. Senate Resolution 43/Assembly Resolution 119 specifically asks voters to decide whether the New Jersey Constitution should be amended to make the State the trustee of public natural resources and guarantee citizens the right to a clean and healthy environment.
The so-called New Jersey Green Amendment was first proposed in 2017 but has previously failed to gain enough traction to come before voters. Earlier this year, Senator Linda Greenstein and Senator Andrew Zwicker re-advanced the amendment with the introduction of Senate Resolution 43.
As in the past, supporters of the amendment maintain that environmental rights need constitutional protection to ensure that government officials act to prevent environmental harm. “Our environment is our greatest asset,’’ said co-sponsor Sen. Linda Greenstein. “We all need clean air, clean water, and a clean environment to thrive.’’
Meanwhile, business groups argue that despite its laudable goals, the proposed amendment would spur environmental litigation and hamper the state’s economic growth. “It is going to impact every major development that we want, or do not want,’’ said Ray Cantor, deputy government affairs director for the New Jersey Business & Industry Association.
Senate Resolution 43/Assembly Resolution 119 proposes to place the question depicted below on the ballot in November:
“Do you approve of amending the Constitution to grant every person the right to a clean and healthy environment? The amendment would also require the State to protect its natural resources.” If the question is approved, the New Jersey Constitution would be amended to provide that:
“Every person has a right to a clean and healthy environment, including pure water, clean air, and ecologically healthy habitats, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic qualities of the environment. The State shall not infringe upon these rights, by action or inaction. The State’s public natural resources, among them its waters, air, flora, fauna, climate, and public lands, are the common property of all the people, including both present and future generations. The State shall serve as trustee of these resources, and shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all people.” The wide breadth of this language may pose problematic to enforce and will likely result in significant litigation among New Jersey stakeholders.
Under Senate Resolution 43/Assembly Resolution 119, as amended, voters would be asked the following question: “Do you approve amending the Constitution to grant every person the right to a clean and healthy environment? The amendment would also require the State to protect its natural resources.”
Under Article IX, paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, the Amendment must receive an affirmative vote from three-fifths of all members of each of the respective houses of the New Jersey legislature, or a majority of same during two consecutive legislative years, before it can be submitted to voters as a ballot question at the general election. If approved, the constitutional amendment would become part of the Constitution on March 1 of the year following the general election at which it is approved by the voters.
Whether New Jersey lawmakers and voters will approve the Green Amendment remains to be seen. Pennsylvania, New York, and Montana have amended their state constitutions to include similar environmental rights. Should it become law, the amendment is likely to spur significant legal challenges and could also make development in New Jersey more burdensome and expensive. The attorneys of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group will continue to monitor the status of the resolution and provide legal updates.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!