Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 13, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBoth publicity rights and trademark rights relate to the control of a certain image, and whether said image is endorsing something or not, whether it be the visage of a living or dead human being or a symbol or word. Eli Manning’s face cannot be used to sell weaponry without his permission – this would be a violation of his publicity rights, since the New York Giants quarterback controls his own image and whether it is used to endorse certain products, campaigns, etc. It is probable that Manning would not appreciate the false impression that he in some way approves the sale of something controversial such as weapons. Similarly, the New York Jets’ logo also cannot be used to sell weaponry. Chances are, the organization also would not be fond of its image being used in a gun advertisement or something of the sort.
However, the hypothetical circumstance concerning the Jets would not be a violation of publicity rights, like the use of Manning’s image would. Instead, this latter situation would fall under the category of trademark rights violations. That’s because, although the two concepts are similar, they ultimately are applied differently.
Right of publicity, also referred to as one’s personality rights, typically refers to name, image and likeness. Everyone has the legal right to control the commercial value of their image, name and likeness. The use of any of those three things without the permission of the individual first would be a violation of his or her publicity rights. Essentially, this concept refers to the value of human identity in a commercial sense. This right is often associated with celebrities due to the frequent use of their images to sell products and services. It is classified as a property right, which means an individual’s right of publicity lives on after he or she passes.
Trademark rights are governed by the Trademark Act of 1946 or the Lanham Act. Unlike right of publicity, trademark rights refer to words, symbols or phrases. The Nike “swoosh,” for example, is a trademark. The company, meanwhile, uses Michael Jordan’s likeness to sell products – this being a publicity right of the former basketball player. Sometimes trademarks can extend beyond a logo or phrase to cover the shape or color of a product. In order for a mark to be considered a trademark, it must be distinctive.
At times, publicity and trademark rights can overlap, but generally, they are separate, though similar, concepts. Both come up often in regard to celebrities and entertainment companies, and should be protected.
If you believe your trademark or publicity rights are being violated, speak with an entertainment law to learn more.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
The bankruptcy legal landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses navigating financial distress. Understanding current bankruptcy trends can help businesses make more informed and strategic decisions. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Trending Upwards Bankruptcy filings continued to trend upwards in 2024. According to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, personal and business […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences. […]
Author: Kenneth C. Oh
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!