Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 9, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAgeism is a “silent, open secret in too many of our workplaces,” according to Victoria Lipnic, acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Lipnic’s comments come on the heels of the EEOC’s new report, The State of Age Discrimination and Older Workers in the U.S.

As the EEOC report highlights, older workers will represent a large segment of the country’s workforce for the foreseeable future. “Don’t get caught up on the 10,000 boomers retiring a day statistic,” Lipnic said at the agency’s EXCEL Training Conference. She noted that many boomers are not financially ready to or interested in retiring, which means that they will remain in the workplace. At the same time, older members of Generation X are now reaching their 50s.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the oldest segments of the workforce —those ages 65 to 74 and 75 and older — are expected to increase the fastest through 2024. This oldest cohort of workers of age 65+ workers is projected to grow by 75 percent by 2050, while the group of workers age 25 to 54 is only expected to grow by 2 percent over this same period.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) forbids age discrimination against people who are age 40 or older. The federal employment law specifically prohibits discrimination in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, benefits, and any other term or condition of employment.
An employment policy or practice that applies to everyone, regardless of age, can be illegal if it has a negative impact on applicants or employees age 40 or older and is not based on a reasonable factor other than age. Accordingly, to avoid running afoul of the ADEA, employers must work to ensure that they are making decisions based on abilities, not age.
More than 6 in 10 workers age 45 and older say they have seen or experienced age discrimination in the workplace, according to a 2017 survey cited in the EEOC report. Of those, 90 percent say it is somewhat or very common. In another survey in 2015, more than 3 of 4 older workers said their age was an obstacle to finding a job.
In total, 18,376 ADEA charges were filed with the EEOC in fiscal year 2017. Unlawful discharge is the most common practice asserted in ADEA charges filed with the EEOC. In fiscal year 2017, 55 percent of ADEA charges alleged discriminatory discharge.
As highlighted by a study at the University of California at Irvine and Tulane University, age discrimination also often impacts hiring. Researchers submitted 40,000 fake job applications that included signals regarding the ages of the applicants and then analyzed the response rates. Overall, applicants age 49-51 applying for administrative positions had a callback rate 29 percent lower than younger workers. For workers over age 64, the response rate was 47 percent lower.
Age discrimination is prevalent largely because employers don’t recognize it as a problem in their workplaces until they face legal action. Below are several best practices that can help employers avoid ADEA liability:
As with any employment issue, the key is to be proactive. To discuss how to deter age discrimination in your workplace, we encourage you to contact one of our experienced employment attorneys who can work with you to create and implement a comprehensive anti-discrimination policy.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jorge R. de Armas or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!