The White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has finalized its comprehensive overhaul of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-implementing regulations...
The White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), an agency within the Executive Office of the President, has finalized its comprehensive overhaul of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-implementing regulations. NEPA requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental impacts of proposed actions as part of agencies’ decision-making processes.
National Environmental Policy Act and Implementing Regulations
The National Environmental Policy Act sets forth procedural requirements, applying that national policy to proposals for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment by requiring Federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on: (1) the environmental impact of the proposed action; (2) any adverse effects that cannot be avoided; (3) alternatives to the proposed action; (4) the relationship between local short-term uses of man’s environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and (5) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the proposed action. NEPA does not include a private right of action and specifies no remedies. Rather, challenges to agency action alleging non-compliance with NEPA procedures are brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In 1978, CEQ promulgated its Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA regulations), which tell federal agencies what they must do to comply with the procedures and achieve the goals of NEPA. The regulations direct Federal agencies to adopt their own implementing procedures to supplement the NEPA regulations. The NEPA regulations have not been significantly amended in more than four decades. In support of its amendments, CEQ maintains that implementation of NEPA has become increasingly complex and time consuming for federal agencies, project applicants, and those seeking permits or approvals from the Federal government. According to the CEQ, the average length of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is over 600 pages, and that the average time for Federal agencies to conduct these NEPA reviews is four and a half years.
In 2017, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13807, which established a two-year goal for completing environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects and directed CEQ to consider revisions to modernize its regulations. In 2018, CEQ issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) requesting comment on potential updates to its regulations. On January 10, 2020, CEQ issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to modernize and clarify the NEPA regulations. It produced more than 1.1 million public comments.
Amended NEPA Implementing Regulations
On July 15, 2020, the CEQ announced its final rule. The amended regulation revises or establishes numerous provisions within several general areas:
Management of the NEPA Process
Establishes presumptive time limits of two years for the preparation of environmental impact statements (EISs) and one year for the preparation of environmental assessments (EAs)
Specifies presumptive page limits for EISs and EAs
Requires joint schedules, a single EIS, and a single record of decision (ROD), where appropriate, for EISs involving multiple Federal agencies
Strengthens the role of the lead agency and requires senior agency officials to oversee NEPA compliance, including timely resolution of disputes to avoid delays
Allows applicants/contractors to assume a greater role in preparing EISs with appropriate disclosure of financial or other interests and with supervision and independent evaluation by the agency
Codification of Relevant Case Law
Includes new provisions to assist Federal agencies in determining whether NEPA applies and the appropriate level of environmental review
Requires agencies to consider environmental effects that are reasonably foreseeable and have a reasonably close causal relationship to the proposed action
Clarifies the definition of major Federal action and excludes activities with minimal Federal funding or involvement such as small business and farm loan guarantees
Directs agencies to analyze a reasonable range and number of technically and economically feasible alternatives
Provides efficiencies to comply with NEPA where procedures and documents required under other statutes satisfy the requirements of the CEQ regulations
Allows agencies to establish procedures to use other agencies’ categorical exclusions (CEs) and to adopt EAs and CE determinations, where appropriate
Public Involvement
Requires agencies to provide more information to and solicit input from the public earlier in the process to ensure and facilitate informed decision making by Federal agencies
Reduces duplication by facilitating use of documents prepared by State, Tribal, and local agencies to comply with NEPA
Enhances ability of Native Americans to participate in the NEPA process and ensures appropriate consultation with affected Tribal governments and agencies
Eliminates provisions in the prior regulations that limit Tribal interest to reservations
Environmental Reviews
Requires agencies to consider the affected environment, including reasonably foreseeable environmental trends and planned actions
Requires agencies to certify consideration of alternatives, information, and analyses submitted by State, Tribal, and local governments and public commenters
Clarifies that mitigation must have a nexus to effects of the proposed action or alternatives
What’s Next?
The rule is scheduled to take effect on September 14, 2020. However, much like other sweeping amendments to environmental regulations, the new NEPA regulations will likely be subject to legal challenges. So while the changes aim to streamline the environmental review process, in the near term, they will create uncertainty and legal risk developers involved in projects that are subject to NEPA.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Overhaul of NEPA Regulations Is Now Final -What It Means For Federal Environmental Reviews
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
The White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has finalized its comprehensive overhaul of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-implementing regulations...
The White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), an agency within the Executive Office of the President, has finalized its comprehensive overhaul of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-implementing regulations. NEPA requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental impacts of proposed actions as part of agencies’ decision-making processes.
National Environmental Policy Act and Implementing Regulations
The National Environmental Policy Act sets forth procedural requirements, applying that national policy to proposals for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment by requiring Federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on: (1) the environmental impact of the proposed action; (2) any adverse effects that cannot be avoided; (3) alternatives to the proposed action; (4) the relationship between local short-term uses of man’s environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and (5) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the proposed action. NEPA does not include a private right of action and specifies no remedies. Rather, challenges to agency action alleging non-compliance with NEPA procedures are brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In 1978, CEQ promulgated its Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA regulations), which tell federal agencies what they must do to comply with the procedures and achieve the goals of NEPA. The regulations direct Federal agencies to adopt their own implementing procedures to supplement the NEPA regulations. The NEPA regulations have not been significantly amended in more than four decades. In support of its amendments, CEQ maintains that implementation of NEPA has become increasingly complex and time consuming for federal agencies, project applicants, and those seeking permits or approvals from the Federal government. According to the CEQ, the average length of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is over 600 pages, and that the average time for Federal agencies to conduct these NEPA reviews is four and a half years.
In 2017, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13807, which established a two-year goal for completing environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects and directed CEQ to consider revisions to modernize its regulations. In 2018, CEQ issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) requesting comment on potential updates to its regulations. On January 10, 2020, CEQ issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to modernize and clarify the NEPA regulations. It produced more than 1.1 million public comments.
Amended NEPA Implementing Regulations
On July 15, 2020, the CEQ announced its final rule. The amended regulation revises or establishes numerous provisions within several general areas:
Management of the NEPA Process
Establishes presumptive time limits of two years for the preparation of environmental impact statements (EISs) and one year for the preparation of environmental assessments (EAs)
Specifies presumptive page limits for EISs and EAs
Requires joint schedules, a single EIS, and a single record of decision (ROD), where appropriate, for EISs involving multiple Federal agencies
Strengthens the role of the lead agency and requires senior agency officials to oversee NEPA compliance, including timely resolution of disputes to avoid delays
Allows applicants/contractors to assume a greater role in preparing EISs with appropriate disclosure of financial or other interests and with supervision and independent evaluation by the agency
Codification of Relevant Case Law
Includes new provisions to assist Federal agencies in determining whether NEPA applies and the appropriate level of environmental review
Requires agencies to consider environmental effects that are reasonably foreseeable and have a reasonably close causal relationship to the proposed action
Clarifies the definition of major Federal action and excludes activities with minimal Federal funding or involvement such as small business and farm loan guarantees
Directs agencies to analyze a reasonable range and number of technically and economically feasible alternatives
Provides efficiencies to comply with NEPA where procedures and documents required under other statutes satisfy the requirements of the CEQ regulations
Allows agencies to establish procedures to use other agencies’ categorical exclusions (CEs) and to adopt EAs and CE determinations, where appropriate
Public Involvement
Requires agencies to provide more information to and solicit input from the public earlier in the process to ensure and facilitate informed decision making by Federal agencies
Reduces duplication by facilitating use of documents prepared by State, Tribal, and local agencies to comply with NEPA
Enhances ability of Native Americans to participate in the NEPA process and ensures appropriate consultation with affected Tribal governments and agencies
Eliminates provisions in the prior regulations that limit Tribal interest to reservations
Environmental Reviews
Requires agencies to consider the affected environment, including reasonably foreseeable environmental trends and planned actions
Requires agencies to certify consideration of alternatives, information, and analyses submitted by State, Tribal, and local governments and public commenters
Clarifies that mitigation must have a nexus to effects of the proposed action or alternatives
What’s Next?
The rule is scheduled to take effect on September 14, 2020. However, much like other sweeping amendments to environmental regulations, the new NEPA regulations will likely be subject to legal challenges. So while the changes aim to streamline the environmental review process, in the near term, they will create uncertainty and legal risk developers involved in projects that are subject to NEPA.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
