The Obama Administration recently proposed new rules that strive to keep the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) birth control mandate in place while seeking to comply with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
The ACA requires employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance coverage for the 20 contraceptive methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which include four that prevent an already fertilized egg from developing further by inhibiting attachment to the uterus. Under existing regulations, accommodations are available for certain eligible organizations, including religious non-profit organizations.
In its controversial , the Supreme Court held that the failure to provide a similar exemption for “closely-held corporations” owned by a few shareholders whose religious beliefs were aligned and who object to providing contraception coverage on religious grounds violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). The question flowing from the decision is: how do you define a “closely held” corporation? The Department of Health and Human Services’ proposed rules attempt to answer that question.
As highlighted in a government fact sheet on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website, the proposed rules offer two alternative approaches for defining a closely-held corporation for the purposes of the ACA. In either case the business entity cannot be publicly traded. The difference in the approaches is that, under one, the ownership of the entity would be limited to a certain number of owners; while under the other, a minimum percentage of ownership would be concentrated among a certain number of owners. The proposal seeks input from the public on the specific thresholds that should be established under either approach.
Under the proposed rules, qualifying closely-held corporations could formalize their religious objections to the mandate via a valid corporate action taken in accordance with the entity’s governing structure, as well as state law, that memorializes its owners’ religious objection. Once the federal government is placed on notice, it would begin the process of providing the contraception services to impacted workers.
The federal government is accepting comments on the proposed rules until October 21, 2014. We will be closely tracking their status and will provide updates as they become available.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Obama Administration Proposes New ACA Rules in Light of Hobby Lobby Decision
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Obama Administration recently proposed new rules that strive to keep the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) birth control mandate in place while seeking to comply with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
The ACA requires employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance coverage for the 20 contraceptive methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which include four that prevent an already fertilized egg from developing further by inhibiting attachment to the uterus. Under existing regulations, accommodations are available for certain eligible organizations, including religious non-profit organizations.
In its controversial , the Supreme Court held that the failure to provide a similar exemption for “closely-held corporations” owned by a few shareholders whose religious beliefs were aligned and who object to providing contraception coverage on religious grounds violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). The question flowing from the decision is: how do you define a “closely held” corporation? The Department of Health and Human Services’ proposed rules attempt to answer that question.
As highlighted in a government fact sheet on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website, the proposed rules offer two alternative approaches for defining a closely-held corporation for the purposes of the ACA. In either case the business entity cannot be publicly traded. The difference in the approaches is that, under one, the ownership of the entity would be limited to a certain number of owners; while under the other, a minimum percentage of ownership would be concentrated among a certain number of owners. The proposal seeks input from the public on the specific thresholds that should be established under either approach.
Under the proposed rules, qualifying closely-held corporations could formalize their religious objections to the mandate via a valid corporate action taken in accordance with the entity’s governing structure, as well as state law, that memorializes its owners’ religious objection. Once the federal government is placed on notice, it would begin the process of providing the contraception services to impacted workers.
The federal government is accepting comments on the proposed rules until October 21, 2014. We will be closely tracking their status and will provide updates as they become available.
